Only the 20 highest-risk communities are shown. 246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
May 19, 2024
Risk Comparison Report
Use this report to determine how risk factors in selected communities compare to each other. Click a community name in any table below to open an individual risk profile report for that community and review its risk factors in more detail.
While reviewing this report, keep in mind that low risk is driven by lower loss due to natural hazards, lower social vulnerability, and higher community resilience.
For more information about the National Risk Index, its data, and how to interpret the information it provides, please review the About the National Risk Index and How to Take Action sections at the end of this report. Or, visit the National Risk Index website at hazards.fema.gov/nri/learn-more to access supporting documentation and links.
Note:
This report includes information about only the 20 highest-risk communities selected. The following 246 communities were originally selected but have been excluded from this report:
Census tract 12095010201, Census tract 12095010202, Census tract 12095010300, Census tract 12095010400, Census tract 12095010500, Census tract 12095010802, Census tract 12095011000, Census tract 12095011100, Census tract 12095011200, Census tract 12095011300, Census tract 12095011600, Census tract 12095011701, Census tract 12095011702, Census tract 12095012000, Census tract 12095012100, Census tract 12095012201, Census tract 12095012202, Census tract 12095012303, Census tract 12095012304, Census tract 12095012305, Census tract 12095012306, Census tract 12095012307, Census tract 12095012402, Census tract 12095012404, Census tract 12095012405, Census tract 12095012500, Census tract 12095012600, Census tract 12095012701, Census tract 12095012900, Census tract 12095013201, Census tract 12095013202, Census tract 12095013300, Census tract 12095013402, Census tract 12095013403, Census tract 12095013405, Census tract 12095013406, Census tract 12095013503, Census tract 12095013505, Census tract 12095013507, Census tract 12095013510, Census tract 12095013511, Census tract 12095013512, Census tract 12095013513, Census tract 12095013603, Census tract 12095013604, Census tract 12095013605, Census tract 12095013606, Census tract 12095013607, Census tract 12095013701, Census tract 12095013702, Census tract 12095013801, Census tract 12095013802, Census tract 12095013803, Census tract 12095013900, Census tract 12095014000, Census tract 12095014100, Census tract 12095014201, Census tract 12095014202, Census tract 12095014301, Census tract 12095014302, Census tract 12095014400, Census tract 12095014502, Census tract 12095014503, Census tract 12095014504, Census tract 12095014601, Census tract 12095014605, Census tract 12095014606, Census tract 12095014607, Census tract 12095014608, Census tract 12095014609, Census tract 12095014701, Census tract 12095014702, Census tract 12095014703, Census tract 12095014705, Census tract 12095014706, Census tract 12095014804, Census tract 12095014805, Census tract 12095014806, Census tract 12095014807, Census tract 12095014809, Census tract 12095014810, Census tract 12095014811, Census tract 12095014813, Census tract 12095014814, Census tract 12095014815, Census tract 12095014904, Census tract 12095014906, Census tract 12095014908, Census tract 12095014909, Census tract 12095015001, Census tract 12095015002, Census tract 12095015003, Census tract 12095015005, Census tract 12095015006, Census tract 12095015103, Census tract 12095015104, Census tract 12095015105, Census tract 12095015106, Census tract 12095015202, Census tract 12095015203, Census tract 12095015204, Census tract 12095015300, Census tract 12095015501, Census tract 12095015601, Census tract 12095015602, Census tract 12095015701, Census tract 12095015702, Census tract 12095015801, Census tract 12095015802, Census tract 12095015901, Census tract 12095016001, Census tract 12095016002, Census tract 12095016100, Census tract 12095016200, Census tract 12095016301, Census tract 12095016302, Census tract 12095016402, Census tract 12095016407, Census tract 12095016408, Census tract 12095016409, Census tract 12095016411, Census tract 12095016412, Census tract 12095016413, Census tract 12095016414, Census tract 12095016503, Census tract 12095016504, Census tract 12095016505, Census tract 12095016509, Census tract 12095016510, Census tract 12095016511, Census tract 12095016512, Census tract 12095016513, Census tract 12095016514, Census tract 12095016603, Census tract 12095016604, Census tract 12095016605, Census tract 12095016606, Census tract 12095016607, Census tract 12095016709, Census tract 12095016710, Census tract 12095016713, Census tract 12095016714, Census tract 12095016715, Census tract 12095016716, Census tract 12095016717, Census tract 12095016723, Census tract 12095016724, Census tract 12095016728, Census tract 12095016731, Census tract 12095016733, Census tract 12095016738, Census tract 12095016739, Census tract 12095016740, Census tract 12095016741, Census tract 12095016742, Census tract 12095016743, Census tract 12095016744, Census tract 12095016745, Census tract 12095016746, Census tract 12095016747, Census tract 12095016748, Census tract 12095016749, Census tract 12095016750, Census tract 12095016751, Census tract 12095016752, Census tract 12095016753, Census tract 12095016754, Census tract 12095016755, Census tract 12095016756, Census tract 12095016803, Census tract 12095016808, Census tract 12095016809, Census tract 12095016810, Census tract 12095016811, Census tract 12095016812, Census tract 12095016813, Census tract 12095016814, Census tract 12095016904, Census tract 12095016906, Census tract 12095016907, Census tract 12095016908, Census tract 12095016909, Census tract 12095016910, Census tract 12095016911, Census tract 12095017004, Census tract 12095017006, Census tract 12095017012, Census tract 12095017013, Census tract 12095017015, Census tract 12095017018, Census tract 12095017019, Census tract 12095017020, Census tract 12095017021, Census tract 12095017022, Census tract 12095017023, Census tract 12095017024, Census tract 12095017025, Census tract 12095017026, Census tract 12095017109, Census tract 12095017110, Census tract 12095017114, Census tract 12095017115, Census tract 12095017116, Census tract 12095017117, Census tract 12095017118, Census tract 12095017119, Census tract 12095017120, Census tract 12095017121, Census tract 12095017122, Census tract 12095017123, Census tract 12095017200, Census tract 12095017301, Census tract 12095017302, Census tract 12095017401, Census tract 12095017402, Census tract 12095017503, Census tract 12095017504, Census tract 12095017505, Census tract 12095017600, Census tract 12095017701, Census tract 12095017702, Census tract 12095017703, Census tract 12095017805, Census tract 12095017806, Census tract 12095017807, Census tract 12095017808, Census tract 12095017809, Census tract 12095017810, Census tract 12095017811, Census tract 12095017812, Census tract 12095017813, Census tract 12095017814, Census tract 12095017901, Census tract 12095018000, Census tract 12095018100, Census tract 12095018201, Census tract 12095018202, Census tract 12095018203, Census tract 12095018204, Census tract 12095018300, Census tract 12095018400, Census tract 12095018500, Census tract 12095018800, Census tract 12095018901, Census tract 12095018902, Census tract 12095019000
Risk Index
Risk Index Legend
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | Very High | 99.23 | ||
| 2 | FL | Very High | 99 | ||
| 3 | FL | Very High | 98.92 | ||
| 4 | FL | Very High | 98.9 | ||
| 5 | FL | Relatively High | 96.44 | ||
| 6 | FL | Relatively High | 95.98 | ||
| 7 | FL | Relatively High | 95.34 | ||
| 8 | FL | Relatively High | 94.38 | ||
| 9 | FL | Relatively High | 93.86 | ||
| 10 | FL | Relatively High | 93.55 | ||
| 11 | FL | Relatively High | 93.26 | ||
| 12 | FL | Relatively High | 92.83 | ||
| 13 | FL | Relatively High | 92.62 | ||
| 14 | FL | Relatively High | 92.01 | ||
| 15 | FL | Relatively High | 91.89 | ||
| 16 | FL | Relatively High | 91.48 | ||
| 17 | FL | Relatively High | 91.36 | ||
| 18 | FL | Relatively High | 91.25 | ||
| 19 | FL | Relatively High | 90.93 | ||
| 20 | FL | Relatively High | 90.53 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $7,305,581 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $8,369,099 | 99.23 | |
| 2 | FL | $7,288,646 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $7,524,910 | 99 | |
| 3 | FL | $4,394,705 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | $7,265,742 | 98.92 | |
| 4 | FL | $4,606,198 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | $7,179,120 | 98.9 | |
| 5 | FL | $2,408,610 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $4,194,116 | 96.44 | |
| 6 | FL | $5,358,276 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | $3,960,295 | 95.98 | |
| 7 | FL | $2,426,070 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $3,652,275 | 95.34 | |
| 8 | FL | $3,234,012 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $3,306,814 | 94.38 | |
| 9 | FL | $1,751,850 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | $3,146,253 | 93.86 | |
| 10 | FL | $4,183,771 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | $3,067,491 | 93.55 | |
| 11 | FL | $2,534,509 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | $2,992,694 | 93.26 | |
| 12 | FL | $2,202,963 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $2,893,545 | 92.83 | |
| 13 | FL | $1,572,685 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | $2,842,662 | 92.62 | |
| 14 | FL | $2,184,381 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | $2,705,734 | 92.01 | |
| 15 | FL | $2,601,299 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $2,683,919 | 91.89 | |
| 16 | FL | $3,081,033 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | $2,610,114 | 91.48 | |
| 17 | FL | $1,991,377 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | $2,584,526 | 91.36 | |
| 18 | FL | $1,546,306 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $2,567,390 | 91.25 | |
| 19 | FL | $1,954,328 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | $2,508,940 | 90.93 | |
| 20 | FL | $2,052,720 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | $2,443,522 | 90.53 | |
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Hazard Type Risk Index
Hazard type Risk Index scores are calculated using data for only a single hazard type, and reflect a community's relative risk for only that hazard type.
Avalanche
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | N/A | N/A | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Coastal Flooding
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | $0 | 0 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Cold Wave
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | Relatively High | 97.48 | ||
| 2 | FL | Relatively High | 96.09 | ||
| 3 | FL | Relatively High | 93.29 | ||
| 4 | FL | Relatively High | 92.55 | ||
| 5 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 88 | ||
| 6 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 87.58 | ||
| 7 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 86.83 | ||
| 8 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 84.33 | ||
| 9 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 81.86 | ||
| 10 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 81.12 | ||
| 11 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 80.79 | ||
| 12 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 78.19 | ||
| 13 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 77.99 | ||
| 14 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 77.37 | ||
| 15 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 77.22 | ||
| 16 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 75.44 | ||
| 17 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 74.84 | ||
| 18 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 74.75 | ||
| 19 | FL | Relatively Low | 61.82 | ||
| 20 | FL | Relatively Low | 60.82 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $118,500 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | $87,583 | 97.48 | |
| 2 | FL | $64,241 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $66,323 | 96.09 | |
| 3 | FL | $36,721 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | $43,360 | 93.29 | |
| 4 | FL | $26,101 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $39,294 | 92.55 | |
| 5 | FL | $28,781 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | $24,382 | 88 | |
| 6 | FL | $20,538 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $23,527 | 87.58 | |
| 7 | FL | $21,345 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $22,023 | 86.83 | |
| 8 | FL | $14,491 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | $17,949 | 84.33 | |
| 9 | FL | $9,006 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | $14,890 | 81.86 | |
| 10 | FL | $13,712 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $14,021 | 81.12 | |
| 11 | FL | $11,479 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | $13,665 | 80.79 | |
| 12 | FL | $6,208 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | $11,221 | 78.19 | |
| 13 | FL | $6,350 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $11,057 | 77.99 | |
| 14 | FL | $6,352 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $10,547 | 77.37 | |
| 15 | FL | $5,800 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | $10,417 | 77.22 | |
| 16 | FL | $6,889 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $9,049 | 75.44 | |
| 17 | FL | $5,544 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | $8,640 | 74.84 | |
| 18 | FL | $6,675 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | $8,569 | 74.75 | |
| 19 | FL | $4,380 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | $3,211 | 61.82 | |
| 20 | FL | $2,277 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | $2,955 | 60.82 | |
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Drought
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | Relatively High | 99.42 | ||
| 2 | FL | Relatively High | 99.06 | ||
| 3 | FL | Relatively High | 98.64 | ||
| 4 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 98.04 | ||
| 5 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 97.18 | ||
| 6 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 94.48 | ||
| 7 | FL | Relatively Low | 86.26 | ||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $660,598 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | $488,247 | 99.42 | |
| 2 | FL | $278,642 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $287,675 | 99.06 | |
| 3 | FL | $166,069 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | $196,091 | 98.64 | |
| 4 | FL | $81,277 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $122,357 | 98.04 | |
| 5 | FL | $86,225 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | $73,046 | 97.18 | |
| 6 | FL | $23,434 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $24,179 | 94.48 | |
| 7 | FL | $1,658 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | $1,973 | 86.26 | |
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | $0 | 0 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Earthquake
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 72.62 | ||
| 2 | FL | Relatively Low | 71.11 | ||
| 3 | FL | Relatively Low | 66.39 | ||
| 4 | FL | Relatively Low | 63.15 | ||
| 5 | FL | Relatively Low | 62.46 | ||
| 6 | FL | Relatively Low | 57.73 | ||
| 7 | FL | Relatively Low | 56.99 | ||
| 8 | FL | Relatively Low | 56.25 | ||
| 9 | FL | Relatively Low | 55.14 | ||
| 10 | FL | Very Low | 54.12 | ||
| 11 | FL | Very Low | 53.2 | ||
| 12 | FL | Very Low | 52.07 | ||
| 13 | FL | Very Low | 45.67 | ||
| 14 | FL | Very Low | 44.96 | ||
| 15 | FL | Very Low | 44.69 | ||
| 16 | FL | Very Low | 44.39 | ||
| 17 | FL | Very Low | 43.28 | ||
| 18 | FL | Very Low | 39.91 | ||
| 19 | FL | Very Low | 36.31 | ||
| 20 | FL | Very Low | 32.76 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $32,127 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | $53,116 | 72.62 | |
| 2 | FL | $29,252 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | $45,591 | 71.11 | |
| 3 | FL | $27,016 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $30,949 | 66.39 | |
| 4 | FL | $14,301 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $24,902 | 63.15 | |
| 5 | FL | $23,143 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $23,893 | 62.46 | |
| 6 | FL | $14,193 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | $18,421 | 57.73 | |
| 7 | FL | $9,858 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | $17,705 | 56.99 | |
| 8 | FL | $9,437 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | $17,058 | 56.25 | |
| 9 | FL | $22,017 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | $16,142 | 55.14 | |
| 10 | FL | $9,267 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $15,387 | 54.12 | |
| 11 | FL | $11,469 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | $14,724 | 53.2 | |
| 12 | FL | $10,598 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $13,921 | 52.07 | |
| 13 | FL | $8,679 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | $10,332 | 45.67 | |
| 14 | FL | $6,638 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $9,994 | 44.96 | |
| 15 | FL | $7,966 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | $9,867 | 44.69 | |
| 16 | FL | $8,243 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | $9,733 | 44.39 | |
| 17 | FL | $8,962 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $9,247 | 43.28 | |
| 18 | FL | $7,782 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $7,957 | 39.91 | |
| 19 | FL | $9,050 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | $6,689 | 36.31 | |
| 20 | FL | $6,662 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | $5,644 | 32.76 | |
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Hail
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | Very Low | 35.7 | ||
| 2 | FL | Very Low | 35.66 | ||
| 3 | FL | Very Low | 31.59 | ||
| 4 | FL | Very Low | 28.59 | ||
| 5 | FL | Very Low | 28.02 | ||
| 6 | FL | Very Low | 27.44 | ||
| 7 | FL | Very Low | 25.48 | ||
| 8 | FL | Very Low | 24.26 | ||
| 9 | FL | Very Low | 24.09 | ||
| 10 | FL | Very Low | 21.86 | ||
| 11 | FL | Very Low | 21.81 | ||
| 12 | FL | Very Low | 21.57 | ||
| 13 | FL | Very Low | 21.34 | ||
| 14 | FL | Very Low | 20.55 | ||
| 15 | FL | Very Low | 20.47 | ||
| 16 | FL | Very Low | 19.65 | ||
| 17 | FL | Very Low | 19.41 | ||
| 18 | FL | Very Low | 18.37 | ||
| 19 | FL | Very Low | 12.68 | ||
| 20 | FL | Very Low | 11.48 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $593 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $612 | 35.7 | |
| 2 | FL | $824 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | $609 | 35.66 | |
| 3 | FL | $279 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $420 | 31.59 | |
| 4 | FL | $284 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $326 | 28.59 | |
| 5 | FL | $301 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $311 | 28.02 | |
| 6 | FL | $251 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | $296 | 27.44 | |
| 7 | FL | $152 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | $252 | 25.48 | |
| 8 | FL | $183 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | $226 | 24.26 | |
| 9 | FL | $188 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | $223 | 24.09 | |
| 10 | FL | $116 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | $181 | 21.86 | |
| 11 | FL | $213 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | $181 | 21.81 | |
| 12 | FL | $173 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $177 | 21.57 | |
| 13 | FL | $99 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $173 | 21.34 | |
| 14 | FL | $89 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | $160 | 20.55 | |
| 15 | FL | $88 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | $159 | 20.47 | |
| 16 | FL | $89 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $148 | 19.65 | |
| 17 | FL | $113 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | $145 | 19.41 | |
| 18 | FL | $99 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $130 | 18.37 | |
| 19 | FL | $98 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | $72 | 12.68 | |
| 20 | FL | $49 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | $63 | 11.48 | |
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Heat Wave
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | $0 | 0 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Hurricane
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | Very High | 99.55 | ||
| 2 | FL | Very High | 99.54 | ||
| 3 | FL | Very High | 98.98 | ||
| 4 | FL | Very High | 98.54 | ||
| 5 | FL | Very High | 98.07 | ||
| 6 | FL | Very High | 96.7 | ||
| 7 | FL | Very High | 96.59 | ||
| 8 | FL | Very High | 95.83 | ||
| 9 | FL | Very High | 95.51 | ||
| 10 | FL | Relatively High | 95.06 | ||
| 11 | FL | Relatively High | 95 | ||
| 12 | FL | Relatively High | 94.92 | ||
| 13 | FL | Relatively High | 93.84 | ||
| 14 | FL | Relatively High | 93.48 | ||
| 15 | FL | Relatively High | 93.25 | ||
| 16 | FL | Relatively High | 92.95 | ||
| 17 | FL | Relatively High | 92.55 | ||
| 18 | FL | Relatively High | 92.25 | ||
| 19 | FL | Relatively High | 90.92 | ||
| 20 | FL | Relatively High | 88.39 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $3,945,345 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | $6,149,128 | 99.55 | |
| 2 | FL | $3,706,559 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | $6,128,033 | 99.54 | |
| 3 | FL | $3,942,398 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $4,516,317 | 98.98 | |
| 4 | FL | $3,837,369 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $3,961,759 | 98.54 | |
| 5 | FL | $1,999,109 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $3,481,051 | 98.07 | |
| 6 | FL | $3,608,395 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | $2,645,632 | 96.7 | |
| 7 | FL | $1,449,228 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | $2,602,757 | 96.59 | |
| 8 | FL | $1,282,963 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | $2,318,984 | 95.83 | |
| 9 | FL | $1,707,823 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | $2,216,513 | 95.51 | |
| 10 | FL | $1,250,478 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $2,076,215 | 95.06 | |
| 11 | FL | $1,569,276 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $2,061,210 | 95 | |
| 12 | FL | $1,589,671 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | $2,040,799 | 94.92 | |
| 13 | FL | $1,193,422 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $1,796,611 | 93.84 | |
| 14 | FL | $1,449,634 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | $1,725,618 | 93.48 | |
| 15 | FL | $1,353,033 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | $1,675,965 | 93.25 | |
| 16 | FL | $1,569,678 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $1,619,533 | 92.95 | |
| 17 | FL | $2,090,836 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | $1,545,334 | 92.55 | |
| 18 | FL | $1,261,483 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | $1,489,532 | 92.25 | |
| 19 | FL | $1,240,096 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $1,268,012 | 90.92 | |
| 20 | FL | $1,132,220 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | $959,167 | 88.39 | |
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Ice Storm
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | N/A | N/A | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Landslide
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | Relatively High | 95.07 | ||
| 2 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 90.1 | ||
| 3 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 89.09 | ||
| 4 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 87.29 | ||
| 5 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 85.9 | ||
| 6 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 84.84 | ||
| 7 | FL | Relatively Low | 59.16 | ||
| 8 | FL | Relatively Low | 58.87 | ||
| 9 | FL | Relatively Low | 55.92 | ||
| 10 | FL | Relatively Low | 55.09 | ||
| 11 | FL | Relatively Low | 54.89 | ||
| 12 | FL | Relatively Low | 54.15 | ||
| 13 | FL | Relatively Low | 48.63 | ||
| 14 | FL | Very Low | 43.54 | ||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $5,636 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | $8,784 | 95.07 | |
| 2 | FL | $3,383 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $5,093 | 90.1 | |
| 3 | FL | $2,609 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | $4,686 | 89.09 | |
| 4 | FL | $3,458 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | $4,083 | 87.29 | |
| 5 | FL | $2,872 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | $3,686 | 85.9 | |
| 6 | FL | $3,007 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $3,445 | 84.84 | |
| 7 | FL | $661 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $676 | 59.16 | |
| 8 | FL | $555 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | $660 | 58.87 | |
| 9 | FL | $501 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $517 | 55.92 | |
| 10 | FL | $567 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | $480 | 55.09 | |
| 11 | FL | $380 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | $471 | 54.89 | |
| 12 | FL | $333 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $437 | 54.15 | |
| 13 | FL | $122 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | $221 | 48.63 | |
| 14 | FL | $95 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | $70 | 43.54 | |
| FL | $0 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $0 | 0 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Lightning
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | Very High | 99.47 | ||
| 2 | FL | Very High | 99.37 | ||
| 3 | FL | Very High | 99.08 | ||
| 4 | FL | Very High | 98.39 | ||
| 5 | FL | Very High | 98.34 | ||
| 6 | FL | Very High | 97.94 | ||
| 7 | FL | Very High | 97.5 | ||
| 8 | FL | Very High | 97.02 | ||
| 9 | FL | Very High | 96.89 | ||
| 10 | FL | Very High | 96.68 | ||
| 11 | FL | Very High | 96.41 | ||
| 12 | FL | Very High | 96.13 | ||
| 13 | FL | Very High | 95.58 | ||
| 14 | FL | Very High | 95.21 | ||
| 15 | FL | Very High | 94.92 | ||
| 16 | FL | Relatively High | 93.68 | ||
| 17 | FL | Relatively High | 92.64 | ||
| 18 | FL | Relatively High | 88.81 | ||
| 19 | FL | Relatively High | 82.22 | ||
| 20 | FL | Relatively High | 80.84 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $78,794 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $90,264 | 99.47 | |
| 2 | FL | $51,973 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | $85,927 | 99.37 | |
| 3 | FL | $73,849 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $76,243 | 99.08 | |
| 4 | FL | $60,564 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $62,488 | 98.39 | |
| 5 | FL | $49,841 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | $61,737 | 98.34 | |
| 6 | FL | $37,633 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $56,654 | 97.94 | |
| 7 | FL | $51,359 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $52,515 | 97.5 | |
| 8 | FL | $28,242 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $49,178 | 97.02 | |
| 9 | FL | $40,429 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | $48,126 | 96.89 | |
| 10 | FL | $30,072 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | $46,869 | 96.68 | |
| 11 | FL | $27,333 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $45,382 | 96.41 | |
| 12 | FL | $24,303 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | $43,928 | 96.13 | |
| 13 | FL | $31,604 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $41,512 | 95.58 | |
| 14 | FL | $54,266 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | $40,108 | 95.21 | |
| 15 | FL | $21,753 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | $39,067 | 94.92 | |
| 16 | FL | $27,462 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | $35,255 | 93.68 | |
| 17 | FL | $38,529 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | $32,640 | 92.64 | |
| 18 | FL | $21,983 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | $25,957 | 88.81 | |
| 19 | FL | $14,762 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | $19,160 | 82.22 | |
| 20 | FL | $24,644 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | $18,069 | 80.84 | |
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Riverine Flooding
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 79.13 | ||
| 2 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 74.4 | ||
| 3 | FL | Relatively Low | 69.35 | ||
| 4 | FL | Relatively Low | 67.56 | ||
| 5 | FL | Relatively Low | 64.76 | ||
| 6 | FL | Relatively Low | 60.31 | ||
| 7 | FL | Relatively Low | 59.52 | ||
| 8 | FL | Relatively Low | 55.74 | ||
| 9 | FL | Relatively Low | 55.63 | ||
| 10 | FL | Relatively Low | 54.11 | ||
| 11 | FL | Relatively Low | 51.43 | ||
| 12 | FL | Relatively Low | 47.94 | ||
| 13 | FL | Relatively Low | 47.18 | ||
| 14 | FL | Relatively Low | 45.34 | ||
| 15 | FL | Relatively Low | 44.98 | ||
| 16 | FL | Relatively Low | 44.45 | ||
| 17 | FL | Relatively Low | 43.18 | ||
| 18 | FL | Relatively Low | 42 | ||
| 19 | FL | Relatively Low | 38.12 | ||
| 20 | FL | Very Low | 33.27 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $59,367 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $60,703 | 79.13 | |
| 2 | FL | $24,445 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $42,566 | 74.4 | |
| 3 | FL | $24,020 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | $29,752 | 69.35 | |
| 4 | FL | $25,411 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $26,235 | 67.56 | |
| 5 | FL | $18,912 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $21,666 | 64.76 | |
| 6 | FL | $15,395 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $15,884 | 60.31 | |
| 7 | FL | $9,984 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $15,030 | 59.52 | |
| 8 | FL | $15,513 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | $11,465 | 55.74 | |
| 9 | FL | $13,413 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | $11,363 | 55.63 | |
| 10 | FL | $6,134 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $10,185 | 54.11 | |
| 11 | FL | $6,409 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | $8,228 | 51.43 | |
| 12 | FL | $5,193 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | $6,182 | 47.94 | |
| 13 | FL | $3,505 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | $5,795 | 47.18 | |
| 14 | FL | $2,707 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | $4,892 | 45.34 | |
| 15 | FL | $3,659 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | $4,749 | 44.98 | |
| 16 | FL | $3,824 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | $4,516 | 44.45 | |
| 17 | FL | $3,051 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $4,007 | 43.18 | |
| 18 | FL | $4,857 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | $3,561 | 42 | |
| 19 | FL | $1,461 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | $2,277 | 38.12 | |
| 20 | FL | $563 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | $1,011 | 33.27 | |
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Strong Wind
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | Relatively High | 89.99 | ||
| 2 | FL | Relatively High | 88.93 | ||
| 3 | FL | Relatively High | 88.62 | ||
| 4 | FL | Relatively High | 85.62 | ||
| 5 | FL | Relatively High | 84.68 | ||
| 6 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 80.02 | ||
| 7 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 78.91 | ||
| 8 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 75.91 | ||
| 9 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 74.76 | ||
| 10 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 73.28 | ||
| 11 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 72.74 | ||
| 12 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 72.35 | ||
| 13 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 71.65 | ||
| 14 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 71.04 | ||
| 15 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 70 | ||
| 16 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 69.32 | ||
| 17 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 68.8 | ||
| 18 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 68.6 | ||
| 19 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 62.39 | ||
| 20 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 61.89 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $72,189 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $74,529 | 89.99 | |
| 2 | FL | $41,525 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | $68,653 | 88.93 | |
| 3 | FL | $43,102 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | $67,178 | 88.62 | |
| 4 | FL | $48,074 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $55,073 | 85.62 | |
| 5 | FL | $70,402 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | $52,034 | 84.68 | |
| 6 | FL | $22,930 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $39,928 | 80.02 | |
| 7 | FL | $25,105 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $37,794 | 78.91 | |
| 8 | FL | $27,796 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | $32,821 | 75.91 | |
| 9 | FL | $17,315 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | $31,098 | 74.76 | |
| 10 | FL | $28,264 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $29,161 | 73.28 | |
| 11 | FL | $38,857 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | $28,489 | 72.74 | |
| 12 | FL | $15,491 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | $28,000 | 72.35 | |
| 13 | FL | $22,773 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | $27,109 | 71.65 | |
| 14 | FL | $20,569 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | $26,406 | 71.04 | |
| 15 | FL | $15,194 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $25,227 | 70 | |
| 16 | FL | $18,678 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $24,534 | 69.32 | |
| 17 | FL | $18,463 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | $23,963 | 68.8 | |
| 18 | FL | $19,157 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | $23,729 | 68.6 | |
| 19 | FL | $17,716 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $18,114 | 62.39 | |
| 20 | FL | $20,952 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | $17,749 | 61.89 | |
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Tornado
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | Very High | 99.18 | ||
| 2 | FL | Very High | 98.96 | ||
| 3 | FL | Very High | 98.88 | ||
| 4 | FL | Very High | 98.84 | ||
| 5 | FL | Very High | 96.23 | ||
| 6 | FL | Very High | 95.37 | ||
| 7 | FL | Very High | 94.71 | ||
| 8 | FL | Relatively High | 93.4 | ||
| 9 | FL | Relatively High | 92.66 | ||
| 10 | FL | Relatively High | 92.28 | ||
| 11 | FL | Relatively High | 92.2 | ||
| 12 | FL | Relatively High | 90.49 | ||
| 13 | FL | Relatively High | 90.45 | ||
| 14 | FL | Relatively High | 89.35 | ||
| 15 | FL | Relatively High | 89.31 | ||
| 16 | FL | Relatively High | 88.51 | ||
| 17 | FL | Relatively High | 87.15 | ||
| 18 | FL | Relatively High | 85.77 | ||
| 19 | FL | Relatively High | 85 | ||
| 20 | FL | Relatively High | 77.3 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $547,927 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | $905,885 | 99.18 | |
| 2 | FL | $537,447 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | $837,654 | 98.96 | |
| 3 | FL | $793,542 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $819,265 | 98.88 | |
| 4 | FL | $708,285 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $811,394 | 98.84 | |
| 5 | FL | $313,134 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $545,261 | 96.23 | |
| 6 | FL | $335,499 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $505,070 | 95.37 | |
| 7 | FL | $465,713 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $480,504 | 94.71 | |
| 8 | FL | $244,633 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | $439,351 | 93.4 | |
| 9 | FL | $352,251 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | $419,314 | 92.66 | |
| 10 | FL | $331,661 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | $410,820 | 92.28 | |
| 11 | FL | $226,236 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | $408,926 | 92.2 | |
| 12 | FL | $223,923 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $371,787 | 90.49 | |
| 13 | FL | $289,089 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | $371,129 | 90.45 | |
| 14 | FL | $480,523 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | $352,313 | 89.35 | |
| 15 | FL | $267,669 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $351,577 | 89.31 | |
| 16 | FL | $456,719 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | $337,560 | 88.51 | |
| 17 | FL | $310,427 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $317,415 | 87.15 | |
| 18 | FL | $230,150 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | $298,702 | 85.77 | |
| 19 | FL | $245,400 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | $289,763 | 85 | |
| 20 | FL | $250,937 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | $212,583 | 77.3 | |
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Tsunami
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
| FL | Insufficient Data | ||||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | N/A | N/A | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Volcanic Activity
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
| FL | Not Applicable | ||||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | N/A | N/A | ||
| FL | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | N/A | N/A | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Wildfire
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | Very High | 99.76 | ||
| 2 | FL | Very High | 99.63 | ||
| 3 | FL | Very High | 99.47 | ||
| 4 | FL | Very High | 99.39 | ||
| 5 | FL | Very High | 99.31 | ||
| 6 | FL | Relatively High | 99.16 | ||
| 7 | FL | Relatively High | 98.98 | ||
| 8 | FL | Relatively High | 98.04 | ||
| 9 | FL | Relatively High | 97.8 | ||
| 10 | FL | Relatively High | 97.64 | ||
| 11 | FL | Relatively High | 95.87 | ||
| 12 | FL | Relatively Low | 85.01 | ||
| 13 | FL | Relatively Low | 84.89 | ||
| 14 | FL | Relatively Low | 83.51 | ||
| 15 | FL | Relatively Low | 78.07 | ||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $2,458,273 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $2,816,139 | 99.76 | |
| 2 | FL | $2,119,166 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $2,187,859 | 99.63 | |
| 3 | FL | $1,532,719 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $1,567,223 | 99.47 | |
| 4 | FL | $1,881,474 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | $1,390,595 | 99.39 | |
| 5 | FL | $1,502,532 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | $1,272,879 | 99.31 | |
| 6 | FL | $706,748 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $1,063,959 | 99.16 | |
| 7 | FL | $759,280 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | $896,542 | 98.98 | |
| 8 | FL | $383,649 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | $475,216 | 98.04 | |
| 9 | FL | $407,644 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $420,591 | 97.8 | |
| 10 | FL | $294,765 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $387,168 | 97.64 | |
| 11 | FL | $159,882 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | $190,321 | 95.87 | |
| 12 | FL | $8,224 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | $12,818 | 85.01 | |
| 13 | FL | $7,536 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $12,513 | 84.89 | |
| 14 | FL | $5,129 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | $9,272 | 83.51 | |
| 15 | FL | $1,930 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | $3,191 | 78.07 | |
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $0 | 0 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Winter Weather
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
| FL | No Rating | 0 | |||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.8 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.73 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.28 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.3 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.65 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.24 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.85 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.56 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.19 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.03 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very Low | Relatively Low | 0.74 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.18 | $0 | 0 | ||
| FL | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.81 | $0 | 0 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Expected Annual Loss
Expected Annual Loss measures the expected loss each year due to natural hazards.
Expected Annual Loss Legend
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $7,305,581 | 99.31 | ||
| 2 | FL | $7,288,646 | 99.31 | ||
| 3 | FL | $5,358,276 | 98.6 | ||
| 4 | FL | $4,606,198 | 97.98 | ||
| 5 | FL | $4,394,705 | 97.74 | ||
| 6 | FL | $4,183,771 | 97.46 | ||
| 7 | FL | $3,234,012 | 95.67 | ||
| 8 | FL | $3,081,033 | 95.23 | ||
| 9 | FL | $2,601,299 | 93.44 | ||
| 10 | FL | $2,534,509 | 93.11 | ||
| 11 | FL | $2,426,070 | 92.58 | ||
| 12 | FL | $2,408,610 | 92.47 | ||
| 13 | FL | $2,202,963 | 91.22 | ||
| 14 | FL | $2,184,381 | 91.1 | ||
| 15 | FL | $2,052,720 | 90.2 | ||
| 16 | FL | $1,991,377 | 89.75 | ||
| 17 | FL | $1,954,328 | 89.46 | ||
| 18 | FL | $1,751,850 | 87.6 | ||
| 19 | FL | $1,572,685 | 85.51 | ||
| 20 | FL | $1,546,306 | 85.16 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Expected Annual Loss for Hazard Types
Expected Annual Loss scores for hazard types are calculated using data for only a single hazard type, and reflect a community's relative expected annual loss for only that hazard type.
Avalanche
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Coastal Flooding
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Cold Wave
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $118,500 | 98.8 | ||
| 2 | FL | $64,241 | 96.6 | ||
| 3 | FL | $36,721 | 92.9 | ||
| 4 | FL | $28,781 | 90.9 | ||
| 5 | FL | $26,101 | 89.9 | ||
| 6 | FL | $21,345 | 87.9 | ||
| 7 | FL | $20,538 | 87.4 | ||
| 8 | FL | $14,491 | 83.1 | ||
| 9 | FL | $13,712 | 82.3 | ||
| 10 | FL | $11,479 | 79.9 | ||
| 11 | FL | $9,006 | 76.5 | ||
| 12 | FL | $6,889 | 73.2 | ||
| 13 | FL | $6,675 | 72.9 | ||
| 14 | FL | $6,352 | 72.3 | ||
| 15 | FL | $6,350 | 72.3 | ||
| 16 | FL | $6,208 | 72.0 | ||
| 17 | FL | $5,800 | 71.1 | ||
| 18 | FL | $5,544 | 70.6 | ||
| 19 | FL | $4,380 | 67.6 | ||
| 20 | FL | $2,277 | 59.3 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Drought
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $660,598 | 99.6 | ||
| 2 | FL | $278,642 | 99.1 | ||
| 3 | FL | $166,069 | 98.6 | ||
| 4 | FL | $86,225 | 97.7 | ||
| 5 | FL | $81,277 | 97.6 | ||
| 6 | FL | $23,434 | 94.8 | ||
| 7 | FL | $1,658 | 86.2 | ||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Earthquake
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $32,127 | 67.5 | ||
| 2 | FL | $29,252 | 66.3 | ||
| 3 | FL | $27,016 | 65.3 | ||
| 4 | FL | $23,143 | 63.1 | ||
| 5 | FL | $22,017 | 62.4 | ||
| 6 | FL | $14,301 | 54.4 | ||
| 7 | FL | $14,193 | 54.3 | ||
| 8 | FL | $11,469 | 49.8 | ||
| 9 | FL | $10,598 | 48.0 | ||
| 10 | FL | $9,858 | 46.3 | ||
| 11 | FL | $9,437 | 45.3 | ||
| 12 | FL | $9,267 | 44.9 | ||
| 13 | FL | $9,050 | 44.3 | ||
| 14 | FL | $8,962 | 44.1 | ||
| 15 | FL | $8,679 | 43.4 | ||
| 16 | FL | $8,243 | 42.2 | ||
| 17 | FL | $7,966 | 41.5 | ||
| 18 | FL | $7,782 | 41.0 | ||
| 19 | FL | $6,662 | 37.5 | ||
| 20 | FL | $6,638 | 37.4 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Hail
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $824 | 40.6 | ||
| 2 | FL | $593 | 37.0 | ||
| 3 | FL | $301 | 30.3 | ||
| 4 | FL | $284 | 29.7 | ||
| 5 | FL | $279 | 29.5 | ||
| 6 | FL | $251 | 28.3 | ||
| 7 | FL | $213 | 26.3 | ||
| 8 | FL | $188 | 24.8 | ||
| 9 | FL | $183 | 24.5 | ||
| 10 | FL | $173 | 23.8 | ||
| 11 | FL | $152 | 22.3 | ||
| 12 | FL | $116 | 19.4 | ||
| 13 | FL | $113 | 19.1 | ||
| 14 | FL | $99 | 17.7 | ||
| 15 | FL | $99 | 17.7 | ||
| 16 | FL | $98 | 17.6 | ||
| 17 | FL | $89 | 16.7 | ||
| 18 | FL | $89 | 16.7 | ||
| 19 | FL | $88 | 16.6 | ||
| 20 | FL | $49 | 10.9 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Heat Wave
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Hurricane
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $3,945,345 | 98.9 | ||
| 2 | FL | $3,942,398 | 98.9 | ||
| 3 | FL | $3,837,369 | 98.9 | ||
| 4 | FL | $3,706,559 | 98.8 | ||
| 5 | FL | $3,608,395 | 98.7 | ||
| 6 | FL | $2,090,836 | 95.8 | ||
| 7 | FL | $1,999,109 | 95.5 | ||
| 8 | FL | $1,707,823 | 94.2 | ||
| 9 | FL | $1,589,671 | 93.6 | ||
| 10 | FL | $1,569,678 | 93.5 | ||
| 11 | FL | $1,569,276 | 93.5 | ||
| 12 | FL | $1,449,634 | 92.9 | ||
| 13 | FL | $1,449,228 | 92.9 | ||
| 14 | FL | $1,353,033 | 92.2 | ||
| 15 | FL | $1,282,963 | 91.7 | ||
| 16 | FL | $1,261,483 | 91.6 | ||
| 17 | FL | $1,250,478 | 91.5 | ||
| 18 | FL | $1,240,096 | 91.4 | ||
| 19 | FL | $1,193,422 | 91.1 | ||
| 20 | FL | $1,132,220 | 90.6 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Ice Storm
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Landslide
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $5,636 | 92.4 | ||
| 2 | FL | $3,458 | 86.0 | ||
| 3 | FL | $3,383 | 85.7 | ||
| 4 | FL | $3,007 | 83.8 | ||
| 5 | FL | $2,872 | 83.1 | ||
| 6 | FL | $2,609 | 81.5 | ||
| 7 | FL | $661 | 59.4 | ||
| 8 | FL | $567 | 57.6 | ||
| 9 | FL | $555 | 57.3 | ||
| 10 | FL | $501 | 56.2 | ||
| 11 | FL | $380 | 53.4 | ||
| 12 | FL | $333 | 52.1 | ||
| 13 | FL | $122 | 45.8 | ||
| 14 | FL | $95 | 44.8 | ||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Lightning
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $78,794 | 99.6 | ||
| 2 | FL | $73,849 | 99.5 | ||
| 3 | FL | $60,564 | 99.1 | ||
| 4 | FL | $54,266 | 98.7 | ||
| 5 | FL | $51,973 | 98.6 | ||
| 6 | FL | $51,359 | 98.5 | ||
| 7 | FL | $49,841 | 98.4 | ||
| 8 | FL | $40,429 | 97.1 | ||
| 9 | FL | $38,529 | 96.7 | ||
| 10 | FL | $37,633 | 96.5 | ||
| 11 | FL | $31,604 | 94.6 | ||
| 12 | FL | $30,072 | 94.0 | ||
| 13 | FL | $28,242 | 93.1 | ||
| 14 | FL | $27,462 | 92.7 | ||
| 15 | FL | $27,333 | 92.6 | ||
| 16 | FL | $24,644 | 90.8 | ||
| 17 | FL | $24,303 | 90.5 | ||
| 18 | FL | $21,983 | 88.7 | ||
| 19 | FL | $21,753 | 88.4 | ||
| 20 | FL | $14,762 | 79.1 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Riverine Flooding
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $59,367 | 80.3 | ||
| 2 | FL | $25,411 | 68.3 | ||
| 3 | FL | $24,445 | 67.7 | ||
| 4 | FL | $24,020 | 67.4 | ||
| 5 | FL | $18,912 | 63.8 | ||
| 6 | FL | $15,513 | 60.9 | ||
| 7 | FL | $15,395 | 60.8 | ||
| 8 | FL | $13,413 | 58.8 | ||
| 9 | FL | $9,984 | 54.7 | ||
| 10 | FL | $6,409 | 49.2 | ||
| 11 | FL | $6,134 | 48.7 | ||
| 12 | FL | $5,193 | 46.8 | ||
| 13 | FL | $4,857 | 46.0 | ||
| 14 | FL | $3,824 | 43.5 | ||
| 15 | FL | $3,659 | 43.0 | ||
| 16 | FL | $3,505 | 42.5 | ||
| 17 | FL | $3,051 | 41.2 | ||
| 18 | FL | $2,707 | 40.1 | ||
| 19 | FL | $1,461 | 35.7 | ||
| 20 | FL | $563 | 31.2 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Strong Wind
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $72,189 | 91.0 | ||
| 2 | FL | $70,402 | 90.7 | ||
| 3 | FL | $48,074 | 85.4 | ||
| 4 | FL | $43,102 | 83.6 | ||
| 5 | FL | $41,525 | 83.0 | ||
| 6 | FL | $38,857 | 81.8 | ||
| 7 | FL | $28,264 | 75.4 | ||
| 8 | FL | $27,796 | 75.0 | ||
| 9 | FL | $25,105 | 72.8 | ||
| 10 | FL | $22,930 | 70.8 | ||
| 11 | FL | $22,773 | 70.6 | ||
| 12 | FL | $20,952 | 68.8 | ||
| 13 | FL | $20,569 | 68.3 | ||
| 14 | FL | $19,157 | 66.7 | ||
| 15 | FL | $18,678 | 66.1 | ||
| 16 | FL | $18,463 | 65.8 | ||
| 17 | FL | $17,716 | 64.8 | ||
| 18 | FL | $17,315 | 64.2 | ||
| 19 | FL | $15,491 | 61.6 | ||
| 20 | FL | $15,194 | 61.2 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Tornado
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $793,542 | 99.3 | ||
| 2 | FL | $708,285 | 99.0 | ||
| 3 | FL | $547,927 | 97.8 | ||
| 4 | FL | $537,447 | 97.6 | ||
| 5 | FL | $480,523 | 96.7 | ||
| 6 | FL | $465,713 | 96.4 | ||
| 7 | FL | $456,719 | 96.2 | ||
| 8 | FL | $352,251 | 92.4 | ||
| 9 | FL | $335,499 | 91.5 | ||
| 10 | FL | $331,661 | 91.2 | ||
| 11 | FL | $313,134 | 90.1 | ||
| 12 | FL | $310,427 | 89.9 | ||
| 13 | FL | $289,089 | 88.3 | ||
| 14 | FL | $267,669 | 86.4 | ||
| 15 | FL | $250,937 | 84.7 | ||
| 16 | FL | $245,400 | 84.1 | ||
| 17 | FL | $244,633 | 84.0 | ||
| 18 | FL | $230,150 | 82.4 | ||
| 19 | FL | $226,236 | 81.9 | ||
| 20 | FL | $223,923 | 81.7 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Tsunami
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Volcanic Activity
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
| FL | N/A | ||||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Wildfire
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | $2,458,273 | 99.7 | ||
| 2 | FL | $2,119,166 | 99.7 | ||
| 3 | FL | $1,881,474 | 99.6 | ||
| 4 | FL | $1,532,719 | 99.5 | ||
| 5 | FL | $1,502,532 | 99.5 | ||
| 6 | FL | $759,280 | 98.9 | ||
| 7 | FL | $706,748 | 98.8 | ||
| 8 | FL | $407,644 | 97.9 | ||
| 9 | FL | $383,649 | 97.8 | ||
| 10 | FL | $294,765 | 97.2 | ||
| 11 | FL | $159,882 | 95.6 | ||
| 12 | FL | $8,224 | 83.4 | ||
| 13 | FL | $7,536 | 83.0 | ||
| 14 | FL | $5,129 | 81.1 | ||
| 15 | FL | $1,930 | 74.2 | ||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Winter Weather
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| FL | $0 | 0.0 | |||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Social Vulnerability
Social Vulnerability measures the susceptibility of social groups to the adverse impacts of natural hazards, including disproportionate death, injury, loss, or disruption of livelihood.
Social Vulnerability Legend
| Rank | Community | State | Rating | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | Very High | 99.8 | ||
| 2 | FL | Very High | 99.3 | ||
| 3 | FL | Very High | 96.6 | ||
| 4 | FL | Very High | 92.5 | ||
| 5 | FL | Very High | 92.1 | ||
| 6 | FL | Very High | 86.7 | ||
| 7 | FL | Very High | 83.2 | ||
| 8 | FL | Relatively High | 67.7 | ||
| 9 | FL | Relatively High | 66.2 | ||
| 10 | FL | Relatively High | 64.9 | ||
| 11 | FL | Relatively High | 60.4 | ||
| 12 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 55.3 | ||
| 13 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 54.3 | ||
| 14 | FL | Relatively Moderate | 50.4 | ||
| 15 | FL | Relatively Low | 36.8 | ||
| 16 | FL | Relatively Low | 36.8 | ||
| 17 | FL | Relatively Low | 35.5 | ||
| 18 | FL | Very Low | 15.6 | ||
| 19 | FL | Very Low | 7.4 | ||
| 20 | FL | Very Low | 7.0 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Community Resilience
Community Resilience measures a County's ability to prepare for anticipated natural hazards, adapt to changing conditions, and withstand and recover rapidly from disruptions.
Community Resilience Legend
| Rank | Community | State | Rating | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
| 1 | FL | Relatively Low | 32.9 | ||
|
246 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
About the National Risk Index
The National Risk Index is a dataset and online tool to help illustrate the United States communities most at risk for 18 natural hazards: Avalanche, Coastal Flooding, Cold Wave, Drought, Earthquake, Hail, Heat Wave, Hurricane, Ice Storm, Landslide, Lightning, Riverine Flooding, Strong Wind, Tornado, Tsunami, Volcanic Activity, Wildfire, and Winter Weather.
The National Risk Index leverages available source data for Expected Annual Loss due to these 18 hazard types, Social Vulnerability, and Community Resilience to develop a baseline relative risk measurement for each United States county and Census tract. These measurements are calculated using average past conditions, but they cannot be used to predict future outcomes for a community. The National Risk Index is intended to fill gaps in available data and analyses to better inform federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial decision makers as they develop risk reduction strategies.
Explore the National Risk Index Map at hazards.fema.gov/nri/map.
Visit the National Risk Index website at hazards.fema.gov/nri/learn-more to access supporting documentation and links.
Calculating the Risk Index
Risk Index scores are calculated using an equation that combines scores for Expected Annual Loss due to natural hazards, Social Vulnerability and Community Resilience:
Risk Index = Expected Annual Loss × ÷ Community Resilience
Risk Index scores are presented as a composite score for all 18 hazard types, as well as individual scores for each hazard type.
For more information, visit hazards.fema.gov/nri/determining-risk.
Calculating Expected Annual Loss
Expected Annual Loss scores are calculated using an equation that combines values for exposure, annualized frequency, and historic loss ratios for 18 hazard types:
Expected Annual Loss = Exposure × Annualized Frequency × Historic Loss Ratio
Expected Annual Loss scores are presented as a composite score for all 18 hazard types, as well as individual scores for each hazard type.
For more information, visit hazards.fema.gov/nri/expected-annual-loss.
Calculating Social Vulnerability
Social Vulnerability is measured using the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
For more information, visit hazards.fema.gov/nri/social-vulnerability.
Calculating Community Resilience
Community Resilience is measured at the County level using the Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities (HVRI BRIC) published by the University of South Carolina's Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute (HVRI).
For more information, visit hazards.fema.gov/nri/community-resilience.
How to Take Action
There are many ways to reduce natural hazard risk through mitigation. Communities with high National Risk Index scores can take action to reduce risk by decreasing Expected Annual Loss due to natural hazards, decreasing Social Vulnerability, and increasing Community Resilience.
For information about how to take action and reduce your risk, visit hazards.fema.gov/nri/take-action.
Disclaimer
The National Risk Index (the Risk Index or the Index) and its associated data are meant for planning purposes only. This tool was created for broad nationwide comparisons and is not a substitute for localized risk assessment analysis. Nationwide datasets used as inputs for the National Risk Index are, in many cases, not as accurate as available local data. Users with access to local data for each National Risk Index risk factor should consider substituting the Risk Index data with local data to recalculate a more accurate risk index. If you decide to download the National Risk Index data and substitute it with local data, you assume responsibility for the accuracy of the data and any resulting data index. Please visit the Contact Us page if you would like to discuss this process further.
The methodology used by the National Risk Index has been reviewed by subject matter experts in the fields of natural hazard risk research, risk analysis, mitigation planning, and emergency management. The processing methods used to create the National Risk Index have produced results similar to those from other natural hazard risk analyses conducted on a smaller scale. The breadth and combination of geographic information systems (GIS) and data processing techniques leveraged by the National Risk Index enable it to incorporate multiple hazard types and risk factors, manage its nationwide scope, and capture what might have been missed using other methods.
The National Risk Index does not consider the intricate economic and physical interdependencies that exist across geographic regions. Keep in mind that hazard impacts in surrounding counties or Census tracts can cause indirect losses in your community regardless of your community's risk profile.
Nationwide data available for some risk factors are rudimentary at this time. The National Risk Index will be continuously updated as new data become available and improved methodologies are identified.
The National Risk Index Contact Us page is available at hazards.fema.gov/nri/contact-us.