Only the 20 highest-risk communities are shown. 285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
Risk Comparison Report
Use this report to determine how risk factors in selected communities compare to each other. Click a community name in any table below to open an individual risk profile report for that community and review its risk factors in more detail.
While reviewing this report, keep in mind that low risk is driven by lower loss due to natural hazards, lower social vulnerability, and higher community resilience.
For more information about the National Risk Index, its data, and how to interpret the information it provides, please review the About the National Risk Index and How to Take Action sections at the end of this report. Or, visit the National Risk Index website at hazards.fema.gov/nri/learn-more to access supporting documentation and links.
Note:
This report includes information about only the 20 highest-risk communities selected. The following 285 communities were originally selected but have been excluded from this report:
Census tract 37119000101, Census tract 37119000102, Census tract 37119000103, Census tract 37119000104, Census tract 37119000301, Census tract 37119000302, Census tract 37119000401, Census tract 37119000402, Census tract 37119000501, Census tract 37119000502, Census tract 37119000503, Census tract 37119000600, Census tract 37119000700, Census tract 37119000800, Census tract 37119000900, Census tract 37119001000, Census tract 37119001100, Census tract 37119001200, Census tract 37119001300, Census tract 37119001400, Census tract 37119001505, Census tract 37119001507, Census tract 37119001509, Census tract 37119001510, Census tract 37119001603, Census tract 37119001605, Census tract 37119001606, Census tract 37119001607, Census tract 37119001608, Census tract 37119001609, Census tract 37119001701, Census tract 37119001801, Census tract 37119001802, Census tract 37119001910, Census tract 37119001911, Census tract 37119001914, Census tract 37119001916, Census tract 37119001917, Census tract 37119001918, Census tract 37119001919, Census tract 37119001920, Census tract 37119001921, Census tract 37119001922, Census tract 37119001923, Census tract 37119001924, Census tract 37119001925, Census tract 37119001926, Census tract 37119001927, Census tract 37119002004, Census tract 37119002005, Census tract 37119002006, Census tract 37119002007, Census tract 37119002008, Census tract 37119002100, Census tract 37119002201, Census tract 37119002202, Census tract 37119002300, Census tract 37119002400, Census tract 37119002500, Census tract 37119002600, Census tract 37119002701, Census tract 37119002702, Census tract 37119002800, Census tract 37119002903, Census tract 37119002905, Census tract 37119002907, Census tract 37119002908, Census tract 37119002909, Census tract 37119002910, Census tract 37119003006, Census tract 37119003012, Census tract 37119003013, Census tract 37119003015, Census tract 37119003016, Census tract 37119003017, Census tract 37119003018, Census tract 37119003019, Census tract 37119003020, Census tract 37119003021, Census tract 37119003022, Census tract 37119003102, Census tract 37119003105, Census tract 37119003106, Census tract 37119003108, Census tract 37119003109, Census tract 37119003110, Census tract 37119003111, Census tract 37119003201, Census tract 37119003203, Census tract 37119003204, Census tract 37119003301, Census tract 37119003302, Census tract 37119003401, Census tract 37119003402, Census tract 37119003500, Census tract 37119003600, Census tract 37119003701, Census tract 37119003702, Census tract 37119003805, Census tract 37119003808, Census tract 37119003809, Census tract 37119003810, Census tract 37119003811, Census tract 37119003903, Census tract 37119004101, Census tract 37119004102, Census tract 37119004200, Census tract 37119004302, Census tract 37119004303, Census tract 37119004304, Census tract 37119004306, Census tract 37119004307, Census tract 37119004500, Census tract 37119004600, Census tract 37119004700, Census tract 37119004800, Census tract 37119004900, Census tract 37119005000, Census tract 37119005200, Census tract 37119005305, Census tract 37119005306, Census tract 37119005307, Census tract 37119005308, Census tract 37119005403, Census tract 37119005404, Census tract 37119005405, Census tract 37119005406, Census tract 37119005508, Census tract 37119005511, Census tract 37119005512, Census tract 37119005513, Census tract 37119005515, Census tract 37119005516, Census tract 37119005517, Census tract 37119005519, Census tract 37119005520, Census tract 37119005522, Census tract 37119005525, Census tract 37119005526, Census tract 37119005527, Census tract 37119005528, Census tract 37119005529, Census tract 37119005530, Census tract 37119005531, Census tract 37119005532, Census tract 37119005533, Census tract 37119005534, Census tract 37119005535, Census tract 37119005609, Census tract 37119005610, Census tract 37119005611, Census tract 37119005612, Census tract 37119005613, Census tract 37119005615, Census tract 37119005616, Census tract 37119005617, Census tract 37119005618, Census tract 37119005619, Census tract 37119005621, Census tract 37119005622, Census tract 37119005623, Census tract 37119005624, Census tract 37119005625, Census tract 37119005626, Census tract 37119005709, Census tract 37119005710, Census tract 37119005712, Census tract 37119005713, Census tract 37119005714, Census tract 37119005715, Census tract 37119005716, Census tract 37119005718, Census tract 37119005719, Census tract 37119005720, Census tract 37119005721, Census tract 37119005722, Census tract 37119005723, Census tract 37119005811, Census tract 37119005815, Census tract 37119005816, Census tract 37119005817, Census tract 37119005826, Census tract 37119005827, Census tract 37119005828, Census tract 37119005829, Census tract 37119005830, Census tract 37119005832, Census tract 37119005833, Census tract 37119005834, Census tract 37119005835, Census tract 37119005836, Census tract 37119005839, Census tract 37119005840, Census tract 37119005843, Census tract 37119005845, Census tract 37119005846, Census tract 37119005847, Census tract 37119005848, Census tract 37119005849, Census tract 37119005850, Census tract 37119005851, Census tract 37119005852, Census tract 37119005853, Census tract 37119005854, Census tract 37119005855, Census tract 37119005856, Census tract 37119005857, Census tract 37119005858, Census tract 37119005859, Census tract 37119005860, Census tract 37119005861, Census tract 37119005862, Census tract 37119005863, Census tract 37119005864, Census tract 37119005865, Census tract 37119005867, Census tract 37119005868, Census tract 37119005908, Census tract 37119005910, Census tract 37119005915, Census tract 37119005916, Census tract 37119005918, Census tract 37119005919, Census tract 37119005920, Census tract 37119005921, Census tract 37119005922, Census tract 37119005923, Census tract 37119005924, Census tract 37119005925, Census tract 37119005926, Census tract 37119005927, Census tract 37119005928, Census tract 37119005929, Census tract 37119005930, Census tract 37119005931, Census tract 37119005932, Census tract 37119006005, Census tract 37119006008, Census tract 37119006009, Census tract 37119006011, Census tract 37119006012, Census tract 37119006013, Census tract 37119006014, Census tract 37119006015, Census tract 37119006016, Census tract 37119006103, Census tract 37119006105, Census tract 37119006108, Census tract 37119006109, Census tract 37119006110, Census tract 37119006111, Census tract 37119006112, Census tract 37119006113, Census tract 37119006114, Census tract 37119006115, Census tract 37119006208, Census tract 37119006209, Census tract 37119006210, Census tract 37119006211, Census tract 37119006212, Census tract 37119006214, Census tract 37119006216, Census tract 37119006217, Census tract 37119006218, Census tract 37119006219, Census tract 37119006220, Census tract 37119006221, Census tract 37119006222, Census tract 37119006223, Census tract 37119006224, Census tract 37119006305, Census tract 37119006306, Census tract 37119006307, Census tract 37119006308, Census tract 37119006309, Census tract 37119006310, Census tract 37119006311, Census tract 37119006404, Census tract 37119006407, Census tract 37119006408, Census tract 37119006409, Census tract 37119006410, Census tract 37119006411, Census tract 37119980100, Census tract 37119980300
Risk Index
Risk Index Legend
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 57.22 | ||
2 | NC | Relatively Low | 56.64 | ||
3 | NC | Relatively Low | 52.66 | ||
4 | NC | Relatively Low | 52.32 | ||
5 | NC | Relatively Low | 49.08 | ||
6 | NC | Relatively Low | 46.95 | ||
7 | NC | Relatively Low | 43.6 | ||
8 | NC | Relatively Low | 41.96 | ||
9 | NC | Relatively Low | 41.68 | ||
10 | NC | Relatively Low | 39.62 | ||
11 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.46 | ||
12 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.28 | ||
13 | NC | Relatively Low | 36.96 | ||
14 | NC | Relatively Low | 36.09 | ||
15 | NC | Relatively Low | 35.12 | ||
16 | NC | Relatively Low | 34.79 | ||
17 | NC | Relatively Low | 34.2 | ||
18 | NC | Relatively Low | 34.19 | ||
19 | NC | Relatively Low | 33.44 | ||
20 | NC | Relatively Low | 31.84 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $415,435 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $652,561 | 57.22 | |
2 | NC | $523,948 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | $641,334 | 56.64 | |
3 | NC | $339,473 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $572,763 | 52.66 | |
4 | NC | $328,005 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | $567,340 | 52.32 | |
5 | NC | $442,652 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | $517,601 | 49.08 | |
6 | NC | $385,042 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | $487,712 | 46.95 | |
7 | NC | $435,113 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $445,234 | 43.6 | |
8 | NC | $293,238 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | $426,144 | 41.96 | |
9 | NC | $243,428 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $423,114 | 41.68 | |
10 | NC | $236,313 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $400,441 | 39.62 | |
11 | NC | $251,735 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $377,372 | 37.46 | |
12 | NC | $223,145 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | $375,860 | 37.28 | |
13 | NC | $373,892 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | $372,838 | 36.96 | |
14 | NC | $218,617 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $363,914 | 36.09 | |
15 | NC | $270,101 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $354,288 | 35.12 | |
16 | NC | $311,144 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | $351,197 | 34.79 | |
17 | NC | $241,148 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | $344,965 | 34.2 | |
18 | NC | $321,024 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | $344,948 | 34.19 | |
19 | NC | $215,786 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $337,755 | 33.44 | |
20 | NC | $188,191 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | $322,864 | 31.84 | |
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Hazard Type Risk Index
Hazard type Risk Index scores are calculated using data for only a single hazard type, and reflect a community's relative risk for only that hazard type.
Avalanche
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | N/A | N/A | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Coastal Flooding
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | N/A | N/A | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Cold Wave
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | $0 | 0 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Drought
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Very Low | 73.51 | ||
2 | NC | Very Low | 73 | ||
3 | NC | Very Low | 69.41 | ||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $30 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | $32 | 73.51 | |
2 | NC | $16 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $25 | 73 | |
3 | NC | $1 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $1 | 69.41 | |
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | $0 | 0 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Earthquake
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 80.51 | ||
2 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 80.37 | ||
3 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 80.21 | ||
4 | NC | Relatively Low | 79.3 | ||
5 | NC | Relatively Low | 78.53 | ||
6 | NC | Relatively Low | 78.11 | ||
7 | NC | Relatively Low | 77.46 | ||
8 | NC | Relatively Low | 76.23 | ||
9 | NC | Relatively Low | 76.2 | ||
10 | NC | Relatively Low | 75.94 | ||
11 | NC | Relatively Low | 75.19 | ||
12 | NC | Relatively Low | 74.94 | ||
13 | NC | Relatively Low | 74.35 | ||
14 | NC | Relatively Low | 73.83 | ||
15 | NC | Relatively Low | 72.83 | ||
16 | NC | Relatively Low | 72.51 | ||
17 | NC | Relatively Low | 66.49 | ||
18 | NC | Relatively Low | 64.55 | ||
19 | NC | Relatively Low | 63.09 | ||
20 | NC | Relatively Low | 62.63 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $93,861 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $158,363 | 80.51 | |
2 | NC | $131,808 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | $154,125 | 80.37 | |
3 | NC | $95,341 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $149,761 | 80.21 | |
4 | NC | $73,498 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | $127,127 | 79.3 | |
5 | NC | $109,338 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $111,881 | 78.53 | |
6 | NC | $85,950 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | $105,206 | 78.11 | |
7 | NC | $75,862 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | $96,091 | 77.46 | |
8 | NC | $46,536 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $80,886 | 76.23 | |
9 | NC | $47,815 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | $80,539 | 76.2 | |
10 | NC | $53,596 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | $77,888 | 75.94 | |
11 | NC | $71,128 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | $70,928 | 75.19 | |
12 | NC | $40,707 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $68,980 | 74.94 | |
13 | NC | $48,994 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $64,265 | 74.35 | |
14 | NC | $35,336 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | $60,623 | 73.83 | |
15 | NC | $50,533 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | $54,299 | 72.83 | |
16 | NC | $46,562 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | $52,555 | 72.51 | |
17 | NC | $19,889 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $31,131 | 66.49 | |
18 | NC | $19,020 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | $27,208 | 64.55 | |
19 | NC | $14,914 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $24,827 | 63.09 | |
20 | NC | $16,103 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $24,140 | 62.63 | |
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Hail
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 58.15 | ||
2 | NC | Relatively Low | 55.08 | ||
3 | NC | Relatively Low | 53.91 | ||
4 | NC | Relatively Low | 53.43 | ||
5 | NC | Relatively Low | 51.61 | ||
6 | NC | Relatively Low | 50.29 | ||
7 | NC | Relatively Low | 49.94 | ||
8 | NC | Relatively Low | 48.22 | ||
9 | NC | Relatively Low | 47.52 | ||
10 | NC | Relatively Low | 47.49 | ||
11 | NC | Relatively Low | 47.3 | ||
12 | NC | Relatively Low | 46 | ||
13 | NC | Relatively Low | 45.7 | ||
14 | NC | Relatively Low | 45.61 | ||
15 | NC | Relatively Low | 44.5 | ||
16 | NC | Very Low | 42.4 | ||
17 | NC | Very Low | 42.32 | ||
18 | NC | Very Low | 41.55 | ||
19 | NC | Very Low | 41.55 | ||
20 | NC | Very Low | 41.24 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $2,565 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | $3,140 | 58.15 | |
2 | NC | $1,617 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $2,540 | 55.08 | |
3 | NC | $2,012 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | $2,353 | 53.91 | |
4 | NC | $1,316 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | $2,277 | 53.43 | |
5 | NC | $1,195 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $2,017 | 51.61 | |
6 | NC | $1,460 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | $1,849 | 50.29 | |
7 | NC | $1,246 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | $1,811 | 49.94 | |
8 | NC | $1,632 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | $1,628 | 48.22 | |
9 | NC | $925 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | $1,559 | 47.52 | |
10 | NC | $1,448 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | $1,556 | 47.49 | |
11 | NC | $884 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $1,537 | 47.3 | |
12 | NC | $1,079 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $1,415 | 46 | |
13 | NC | $1,354 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $1,385 | 45.7 | |
14 | NC | $812 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $1,376 | 45.61 | |
15 | NC | $1,129 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | $1,274 | 44.5 | |
16 | NC | $758 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | $1,085 | 42.4 | |
17 | NC | $689 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $1,078 | 42.32 | |
18 | NC | $592 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | $1,015 | 41.55 | |
19 | NC | $677 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $1,015 | 41.55 | |
20 | NC | $595 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $990 | 41.24 | |
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Heat Wave
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 45.53 | ||
2 | NC | Relatively Low | 44.95 | ||
3 | NC | Relatively Low | 44.01 | ||
4 | NC | Relatively Low | 43.34 | ||
5 | NC | Relatively Low | 42.82 | ||
6 | NC | Relatively Low | 42.6 | ||
7 | NC | Relatively Low | 40.65 | ||
8 | NC | Relatively Low | 40.4 | ||
9 | NC | Relatively Low | 39.57 | ||
10 | NC | Relatively Low | 39.34 | ||
11 | NC | Relatively Low | 38.33 | ||
12 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.93 | ||
13 | NC | Relatively Low | 36.65 | ||
14 | NC | Relatively Low | 36.28 | ||
15 | NC | Relatively Low | 35.78 | ||
16 | NC | Relatively Low | 35.34 | ||
17 | NC | Relatively Low | 35.24 | ||
18 | NC | Relatively Low | 31.09 | ||
19 | NC | Relatively Low | 30.98 | ||
20 | NC | Very Low | 15.75 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $4,735 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $7,097 | 45.53 | |
2 | NC | $4,123 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $6,863 | 44.95 | |
3 | NC | $5,285 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | $6,469 | 44.01 | |
4 | NC | $4,282 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | $6,222 | 43.34 | |
5 | NC | $4,211 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | $6,024 | 42.82 | |
6 | NC | $3,795 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $5,941 | 42.6 | |
7 | NC | $4,160 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | $5,269 | 40.65 | |
8 | NC | $3,021 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | $5,182 | 40.4 | |
9 | NC | $2,831 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | $4,897 | 39.57 | |
10 | NC | $2,846 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $4,822 | 39.34 | |
11 | NC | $2,870 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $4,508 | 38.33 | |
12 | NC | $4,084 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | $4,388 | 37.93 | |
13 | NC | $3,576 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | $4,037 | 36.65 | |
14 | NC | $2,265 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $3,937 | 36.28 | |
15 | NC | $2,252 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $3,799 | 35.78 | |
16 | NC | $2,803 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $3,676 | 35.34 | |
17 | NC | $3,667 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | $3,656 | 35.24 | |
18 | NC | $2,610 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $2,670 | 31.09 | |
19 | NC | $1,571 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | $2,646 | 30.98 | |
20 | NC | $4 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | $5 | 15.75 | |
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Hurricane
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 72.56 | ||
2 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 69.84 | ||
3 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 69.61 | ||
4 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 67.93 | ||
5 | NC | Relatively Low | 66.33 | ||
6 | NC | Relatively Low | 66.16 | ||
7 | NC | Relatively Low | 64.21 | ||
8 | NC | Relatively Low | 62.81 | ||
9 | NC | Relatively Low | 62.42 | ||
10 | NC | Relatively Low | 62.39 | ||
11 | NC | Relatively Low | 61.78 | ||
12 | NC | Relatively Low | 60.72 | ||
13 | NC | Relatively Low | 60.64 | ||
14 | NC | Relatively Low | 59.85 | ||
15 | NC | Relatively Low | 59.24 | ||
16 | NC | Relatively Low | 58.97 | ||
17 | NC | Relatively Low | 58.58 | ||
18 | NC | Relatively Low | 55.98 | ||
19 | NC | Relatively Low | 55.5 | ||
20 | NC | Relatively Low | 54.45 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $160,565 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | $196,538 | 72.56 | |
2 | NC | $142,563 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | $166,701 | 69.84 | |
3 | NC | $104,957 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $164,865 | 69.61 | |
4 | NC | $86,095 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | $148,915 | 67.93 | |
5 | NC | $131,644 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $134,706 | 66.33 | |
6 | NC | $78,986 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $133,267 | 66.16 | |
7 | NC | $92,861 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | $117,622 | 64.21 | |
8 | NC | $73,367 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | $106,620 | 62.81 | |
9 | NC | $61,576 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | $103,716 | 62.42 | |
10 | NC | $103,653 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | $103,361 | 62.39 | |
11 | NC | $56,902 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $98,904 | 61.78 | |
12 | NC | $84,917 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | $91,245 | 60.72 | |
13 | NC | $69,220 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $90,795 | 60.64 | |
14 | NC | $50,312 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $85,256 | 59.85 | |
15 | NC | $54,423 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $81,584 | 59.24 | |
16 | NC | $70,910 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | $80,038 | 58.97 | |
17 | NC | $54,256 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | $77,614 | 58.58 | |
18 | NC | $39,132 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $61,251 | 55.98 | |
19 | NC | $34,192 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | $58,661 | 55.5 | |
20 | NC | $31,628 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $52,649 | 54.45 | |
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Ice Storm
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Relatively High | 93.56 | ||
2 | NC | Relatively High | 93.29 | ||
3 | NC | Relatively High | 92.84 | ||
4 | NC | Relatively High | 92.83 | ||
5 | NC | Relatively High | 91.82 | ||
6 | NC | Relatively High | 90.93 | ||
7 | NC | Relatively High | 89.53 | ||
8 | NC | Relatively High | 89.29 | ||
9 | NC | Relatively High | 88.4 | ||
10 | NC | Relatively High | 88.28 | ||
11 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 88.02 | ||
12 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 87.61 | ||
13 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 87.28 | ||
14 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 87.24 | ||
15 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 85.36 | ||
16 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 84.92 | ||
17 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 84.65 | ||
18 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 84.22 | ||
19 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 83.66 | ||
20 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 83.22 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $28,238 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $44,355 | 93.56 | |
2 | NC | $36,799 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | $43,030 | 93.29 | |
3 | NC | $33,040 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | $40,443 | 92.84 | |
4 | NC | $23,369 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | $40,421 | 92.83 | |
5 | NC | $21,300 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $35,937 | 91.82 | |
6 | NC | $25,653 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | $32,494 | 90.93 | |
7 | NC | $16,530 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | $27,842 | 89.53 | |
8 | NC | $15,605 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $27,123 | 89.29 | |
9 | NC | $19,001 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $24,924 | 88.4 | |
10 | NC | $24,694 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | $24,624 | 88.28 | |
11 | NC | $14,139 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $23,959 | 88.02 | |
12 | NC | $22,583 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $23,108 | 87.61 | |
13 | NC | $15,405 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | $22,386 | 87.28 | |
14 | NC | $19,751 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | $22,294 | 87.24 | |
15 | NC | $17,553 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | $18,861 | 85.36 | |
16 | NC | $11,638 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $18,216 | 84.92 | |
17 | NC | $12,441 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | $17,797 | 84.65 | |
18 | NC | $10,048 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | $17,239 | 84.22 | |
19 | NC | $9,833 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $16,369 | 83.66 | |
20 | NC | $10,551 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $15,817 | 83.22 | |
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Landslide
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 86.38 | ||
2 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 82.78 | ||
3 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 81 | ||
4 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 80.75 | ||
5 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 77.02 | ||
6 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 73.69 | ||
7 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 73.6 | ||
8 | NC | Relatively Low | 62.95 | ||
9 | NC | Relatively Low | 58.09 | ||
10 | NC | Relatively Low | 55.62 | ||
11 | NC | Relatively Low | 54.37 | ||
12 | NC | Relatively Low | 53.01 | ||
13 | NC | Relatively Low | 51.79 | ||
14 | NC | Relatively Low | 51.15 | ||
15 | NC | Very Low | 40.03 | ||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
NC | No Rating | 0 | |||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $3,126 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | $3,826 | 86.38 | |
2 | NC | $2,005 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $3,006 | 82.78 | |
3 | NC | $1,705 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $2,679 | 81 | |
4 | NC | $1,557 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $2,639 | 80.75 | |
5 | NC | $2,065 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $2,113 | 77.02 | |
6 | NC | $1,740 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | $1,736 | 73.69 | |
7 | NC | $1,006 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | $1,726 | 73.6 | |
8 | NC | $573 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $896 | 62.95 | |
9 | NC | $427 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | $621 | 58.09 | |
10 | NC | $298 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $503 | 55.62 | |
11 | NC | $312 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | $447 | 54.37 | |
12 | NC | $296 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $388 | 53.01 | |
13 | NC | $317 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | $341 | 51.79 | |
14 | NC | $270 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | $316 | 51.15 | |
15 | NC | $6 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | $7 | 40.03 | |
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $0 | 0 | ||
NC | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | $0 | 0 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Lightning
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Relatively High | 87.3 | ||
2 | NC | Relatively High | 84.85 | ||
3 | NC | Relatively High | 84.47 | ||
4 | NC | Relatively High | 83.56 | ||
5 | NC | Relatively High | 82.7 | ||
6 | NC | Relatively High | 82.59 | ||
7 | NC | Relatively High | 78.6 | ||
8 | NC | Relatively High | 77.59 | ||
9 | NC | Relatively High | 76.55 | ||
10 | NC | Relatively High | 76.41 | ||
11 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 75.07 | ||
12 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 74.66 | ||
13 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 74.3 | ||
14 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 74.27 | ||
15 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 73.75 | ||
16 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 73.16 | ||
17 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 71.87 | ||
18 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 65.93 | ||
19 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 65.59 | ||
20 | NC | Relatively Low | 40.1 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $19,646 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | $24,048 | 87.3 | |
2 | NC | $12,869 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $21,422 | 84.85 | |
3 | NC | $14,052 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $21,065 | 84.47 | |
4 | NC | $13,945 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | $20,266 | 83.56 | |
5 | NC | $12,498 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $19,563 | 82.7 | |
6 | NC | $13,595 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | $19,448 | 82.59 | |
7 | NC | $10,515 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $16,517 | 78.6 | |
8 | NC | $9,172 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | $15,864 | 77.59 | |
9 | NC | $8,992 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $15,237 | 76.55 | |
10 | NC | $11,970 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | $15,162 | 76.41 | |
11 | NC | $8,397 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | $14,406 | 75.07 | |
12 | NC | $12,581 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | $14,200 | 74.66 | |
13 | NC | $13,043 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | $14,015 | 74.3 | |
14 | NC | $10,675 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $14,002 | 74.27 | |
15 | NC | $13,778 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | $13,739 | 73.75 | |
16 | NC | $7,736 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $13,447 | 73.16 | |
17 | NC | $7,569 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $12,770 | 71.87 | |
18 | NC | $6,191 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | $10,427 | 65.93 | |
19 | NC | $10,063 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $10,297 | 65.59 | |
20 | NC | $3,562 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | $4,166 | 40.1 | |
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Riverine Flooding
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 76.84 | ||
2 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 71.87 | ||
3 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 71.42 | ||
4 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 70.57 | ||
5 | NC | Relatively Low | 67.44 | ||
6 | NC | Relatively Low | 66.61 | ||
7 | NC | Relatively Low | 66.02 | ||
8 | NC | Relatively Low | 59.53 | ||
9 | NC | Relatively Low | 52.54 | ||
10 | NC | Relatively Low | 52.04 | ||
11 | NC | Relatively Low | 50.55 | ||
12 | NC | Relatively Low | 45.43 | ||
13 | NC | Relatively Low | 45.28 | ||
14 | NC | Relatively Low | 40.15 | ||
15 | NC | Very Low | 35.04 | ||
16 | NC | Very Low | 34.44 | ||
17 | NC | Very Low | 34.41 | ||
18 | NC | Very Low | 30.82 | ||
19 | NC | Very Low | 28.72 | ||
20 | NC | Very Low | 25.22 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $30,659 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $51,035 | 76.84 | |
2 | NC | $21,077 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $35,562 | 71.87 | |
3 | NC | $21,970 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $34,510 | 71.42 | |
4 | NC | $18,710 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $32,521 | 70.57 | |
5 | NC | $15,350 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $26,012 | 67.44 | |
6 | NC | $21,786 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | $24,590 | 66.61 | |
7 | NC | $15,084 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $23,610 | 66.02 | |
8 | NC | $13,993 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | $15,036 | 59.53 | |
9 | NC | $7,098 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | $8,991 | 52.54 | |
10 | NC | $7,396 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | $8,648 | 52.04 | |
11 | NC | $4,556 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | $7,674 | 50.55 | |
12 | NC | $2,878 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | $4,938 | 45.43 | |
13 | NC | $3,976 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | $4,867 | 45.28 | |
14 | NC | $2,007 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | $2,917 | 40.15 | |
15 | NC | $989 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | $1,415 | 35.04 | |
16 | NC | $971 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $1,274 | 34.44 | |
17 | NC | $1,234 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $1,263 | 34.41 | |
18 | NC | $362 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $543 | 30.82 | |
19 | NC | $240 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | $239 | 28.72 | |
20 | NC | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | $0 | 25.22 | |
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Strong Wind
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 67.02 | ||
2 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 66.37 | ||
3 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 64.32 | ||
4 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 63.78 | ||
5 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 63.55 | ||
6 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 62.52 | ||
7 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 61.96 | ||
8 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 60.88 | ||
9 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 60.85 | ||
10 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 60.43 | ||
11 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 59.77 | ||
12 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 56.89 | ||
13 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 56.35 | ||
14 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 56.14 | ||
15 | NC | Relatively Low | 54.78 | ||
16 | NC | Relatively Low | 53.69 | ||
17 | NC | Relatively Low | 53.14 | ||
18 | NC | Relatively Low | 49.76 | ||
19 | NC | Relatively Low | 49.67 | ||
20 | NC | Relatively Low | 31.84 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $14,770 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $22,141 | 67.02 | |
2 | NC | $12,931 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $21,525 | 66.37 | |
3 | NC | $16,051 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | $19,647 | 64.32 | |
4 | NC | $13,416 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | $19,192 | 63.78 | |
5 | NC | $12,123 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $18,975 | 63.55 | |
6 | NC | $14,380 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | $18,215 | 62.52 | |
7 | NC | $10,289 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | $17,796 | 61.96 | |
8 | NC | $10,820 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $16,996 | 60.88 | |
9 | NC | $11,683 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | $16,978 | 60.85 | |
10 | NC | $9,715 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | $16,667 | 60.43 | |
11 | NC | $9,548 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $16,180 | 59.77 | |
12 | NC | $8,412 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $14,193 | 56.89 | |
13 | NC | $7,969 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $13,852 | 56.35 | |
14 | NC | $12,167 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | $13,734 | 56.14 | |
15 | NC | $9,834 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $12,900 | 54.78 | |
16 | NC | $11,413 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | $12,263 | 53.69 | |
17 | NC | $11,962 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | $11,928 | 53.14 | |
18 | NC | $6,010 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | $10,123 | 49.76 | |
19 | NC | $9,846 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $10,076 | 49.67 | |
20 | NC | $3,131 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | $3,661 | 31.84 | |
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Tornado
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Relatively High | 79.68 | ||
2 | NC | Relatively High | 77.16 | ||
3 | NC | Relatively High | 76.43 | ||
4 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 75.03 | ||
5 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 74.08 | ||
6 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 72.26 | ||
7 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 71.68 | ||
8 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 71.03 | ||
9 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 70.77 | ||
10 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 69.26 | ||
11 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 69.14 | ||
12 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 68.33 | ||
13 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 67.82 | ||
14 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 66.79 | ||
15 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 66.62 | ||
16 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 66.38 | ||
17 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 66.27 | ||
18 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 65.84 | ||
19 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 65.27 | ||
20 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 64.96 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $190,883 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | $233,648 | 79.68 | |
2 | NC | $134,632 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $211,479 | 77.16 | |
3 | NC | $118,953 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | $205,749 | 76.43 | |
4 | NC | $129,774 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $194,543 | 75.03 | |
5 | NC | $147,964 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | $187,417 | 74.08 | |
6 | NC | $102,992 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $173,769 | 72.26 | |
7 | NC | $118,789 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | $169,929 | 71.68 | |
8 | NC | $113,914 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | $165,544 | 71.03 | |
9 | NC | $98,483 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $163,937 | 70.77 | |
10 | NC | $98,644 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $154,401 | 69.26 | |
11 | NC | $90,679 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $153,660 | 69.14 | |
12 | NC | $85,619 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $148,819 | 68.33 | |
13 | NC | $142,209 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $145,517 | 67.82 | |
14 | NC | $80,948 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | $138,876 | 66.79 | |
15 | NC | $104,993 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $137,718 | 66.62 | |
16 | NC | $136,725 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | $136,339 | 66.38 | |
17 | NC | $120,084 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | $135,542 | 66.27 | |
18 | NC | $113,726 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | $132,981 | 65.84 | |
19 | NC | $77,004 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | $129,704 | 65.27 | |
20 | NC | $118,745 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | $127,595 | 64.96 | |
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Tsunami
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | N/A | N/A | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Volcanic Activity
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
NC | Not Applicable | ||||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | N/A | N/A | ||
NC | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | N/A | N/A | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Wildfire
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 80.57 | ||
2 | NC | Relatively Low | 79.7 | ||
3 | NC | Relatively Low | 78.91 | ||
4 | NC | Relatively Low | 78.71 | ||
5 | NC | Relatively Low | 78.57 | ||
6 | NC | Relatively Low | 78.28 | ||
7 | NC | Relatively Low | 77.65 | ||
8 | NC | Relatively Low | 77.59 | ||
9 | NC | Relatively Low | 77.55 | ||
10 | NC | Relatively Low | 76.1 | ||
11 | NC | Relatively Low | 74.12 | ||
12 | NC | Relatively Low | 73.95 | ||
13 | NC | Relatively Low | 72.47 | ||
14 | NC | Relatively Low | 70.53 | ||
15 | NC | Relatively Low | 70.46 | ||
16 | NC | Relatively Low | 69.74 | ||
17 | NC | Relatively Low | 67.76 | ||
18 | NC | Relatively Low | 66.09 | ||
19 | NC | Relatively Low | 65.33 | ||
20 | NC | Relatively Low | 62.05 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $3,337 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $5,003 | 80.57 | |
2 | NC | $3,960 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | $4,255 | 79.7 | |
3 | NC | $3,688 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | $3,678 | 78.91 | |
4 | NC | $2,485 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | $3,555 | 78.71 | |
5 | NC | $2,385 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | $3,467 | 78.57 | |
6 | NC | $2,604 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | $3,299 | 78.28 | |
7 | NC | $1,898 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $2,981 | 77.65 | |
8 | NC | $1,777 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $2,959 | 77.59 | |
9 | NC | $1,699 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | $2,939 | 77.55 | |
10 | NC | $1,429 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | $2,451 | 76.1 | |
11 | NC | $1,518 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $1,992 | 74.12 | |
12 | NC | $1,739 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | $1,963 | 73.95 | |
13 | NC | $1,401 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | $1,715 | 72.47 | |
14 | NC | $945 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $1,479 | 70.53 | |
15 | NC | $872 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $1,471 | 70.46 | |
16 | NC | $1,362 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $1,393 | 69.74 | |
17 | NC | $713 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $1,208 | 67.76 | |
18 | NC | $618 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $1,074 | 66.09 | |
19 | NC | $871 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | $1,019 | 65.33 | |
20 | NC | $484 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | $816 | 62.05 | |
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Winter Weather
Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 53.35 | ||
2 | NC | Relatively Low | 49.06 | ||
3 | NC | Relatively Low | 48.95 | ||
4 | NC | Relatively Low | 48.05 | ||
5 | NC | Relatively Low | 47.92 | ||
6 | NC | Relatively Low | 47.84 | ||
7 | NC | Relatively Low | 47.33 | ||
8 | NC | Relatively Low | 46.53 | ||
9 | NC | Relatively Low | 45.97 | ||
10 | NC | Relatively Low | 44.29 | ||
11 | NC | Relatively Low | 44.29 | ||
12 | NC | Relatively Low | 43.69 | ||
13 | NC | Relatively Low | 43.42 | ||
14 | NC | Relatively Low | 42.62 | ||
15 | NC | Relatively Low | 42.11 | ||
16 | NC | Relatively Low | 41.81 | ||
17 | NC | Relatively Low | 41.45 | ||
18 | NC | Relatively Low | 39.33 | ||
19 | NC | Relatively Low | 39.19 | ||
20 | NC | Relatively Low | 35.02 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $1,460 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.22 | $1,787 | 53.35 | |
2 | NC | $980 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.45 | $1,424 | 49.06 | |
3 | NC | $945 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $1,417 | 48.95 | |
4 | NC | $782 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.73 | $1,353 | 48.05 | |
5 | NC | $856 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $1,345 | 47.92 | |
6 | NC | $804 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.66 | $1,339 | 47.84 | |
7 | NC | $1,029 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.27 | $1,304 | 47.33 | |
8 | NC | $874 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.43 | $1,250 | 46.53 | |
9 | NC | $776 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $1,215 | 45.97 | |
10 | NC | $657 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $1,113 | 44.29 | |
11 | NC | $660 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.69 | $1,113 | 44.29 | |
12 | NC | $629 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.72 | $1,079 | 43.69 | |
13 | NC | $988 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.07 | $1,062 | 43.42 | |
14 | NC | $583 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.74 | $1,014 | 42.62 | |
15 | NC | $985 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1 | $982 | 42.11 | |
16 | NC | $853 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.13 | $963 | 41.81 | |
17 | NC | $717 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.31 | $941 | 41.45 | |
18 | NC | $803 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 1.02 | $822 | 39.33 | |
19 | NC | $483 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.68 | $814 | 39.19 | |
20 | NC | $510 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.17 | $596 | 35.02 | |
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Expected Annual Loss
Expected Annual Loss measures the expected loss each year due to natural hazards.
Expected Annual Loss Legend
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $523,948 | 52.62 | ||
2 | NC | $442,652 | 46.02 | ||
3 | NC | $435,113 | 45.32 | ||
4 | NC | $415,435 | 43.51 | ||
5 | NC | $385,042 | 40.47 | ||
6 | NC | $373,892 | 39.36 | ||
7 | NC | $339,473 | 35.69 | ||
8 | NC | $328,005 | 34.48 | ||
9 | NC | $321,024 | 33.74 | ||
10 | NC | $311,144 | 32.66 | ||
11 | NC | $293,238 | 30.62 | ||
12 | NC | $270,101 | 27.89 | ||
13 | NC | $251,735 | 25.71 | ||
14 | NC | $243,428 | 24.69 | ||
15 | NC | $241,148 | 24.4 | ||
16 | NC | $236,313 | 23.73 | ||
17 | NC | $223,145 | 22.07 | ||
18 | NC | $218,617 | 21.45 | ||
19 | NC | $215,786 | 21.13 | ||
20 | NC | $188,191 | 17.37 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Expected Annual Loss for Hazard Types
Expected Annual Loss scores for hazard types are calculated using data for only a single hazard type, and reflect a community's relative expected annual loss for only that hazard type.
Avalanche
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Coastal Flooding
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Cold Wave
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Drought
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $30 | 73.8 | ||
2 | NC | $16 | 72.5 | ||
3 | NC | $1 | 69.8 | ||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Earthquake
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $131,808 | 79.4 | ||
2 | NC | $109,338 | 78.4 | ||
3 | NC | $95,341 | 77.5 | ||
4 | NC | $93,861 | 77.4 | ||
5 | NC | $85,950 | 76.9 | ||
6 | NC | $75,862 | 76.0 | ||
7 | NC | $73,498 | 75.8 | ||
8 | NC | $71,128 | 75.6 | ||
9 | NC | $53,596 | 73.2 | ||
10 | NC | $50,533 | 72.6 | ||
11 | NC | $48,994 | 72.3 | ||
12 | NC | $47,815 | 72.1 | ||
13 | NC | $46,562 | 71.8 | ||
14 | NC | $46,536 | 71.8 | ||
15 | NC | $40,707 | 70.4 | ||
16 | NC | $35,336 | 68.7 | ||
17 | NC | $19,889 | 60.7 | ||
18 | NC | $19,020 | 60.0 | ||
19 | NC | $16,103 | 56.8 | ||
20 | NC | $14,914 | 55.3 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Hail
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $2,565 | 57.3 | ||
2 | NC | $2,012 | 53.6 | ||
3 | NC | $1,632 | 50.3 | ||
4 | NC | $1,617 | 50.2 | ||
5 | NC | $1,460 | 48.6 | ||
6 | NC | $1,448 | 48.4 | ||
7 | NC | $1,354 | 47.4 | ||
8 | NC | $1,316 | 47.0 | ||
9 | NC | $1,246 | 46.2 | ||
10 | NC | $1,195 | 45.6 | ||
11 | NC | $1,129 | 44.8 | ||
12 | NC | $1,079 | 44.2 | ||
13 | NC | $925 | 42.1 | ||
14 | NC | $884 | 41.5 | ||
15 | NC | $812 | 40.5 | ||
16 | NC | $758 | 39.7 | ||
17 | NC | $689 | 38.6 | ||
18 | NC | $677 | 38.4 | ||
19 | NC | $595 | 37.0 | ||
20 | NC | $592 | 37.0 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Heat Wave
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $5,285 | 42.8 | ||
2 | NC | $4,735 | 41.1 | ||
3 | NC | $4,282 | 39.6 | ||
4 | NC | $4,211 | 39.4 | ||
5 | NC | $4,160 | 39.2 | ||
6 | NC | $4,123 | 39.1 | ||
7 | NC | $4,084 | 38.9 | ||
8 | NC | $3,795 | 37.8 | ||
9 | NC | $3,667 | 37.3 | ||
10 | NC | $3,576 | 36.9 | ||
11 | NC | $3,021 | 34.5 | ||
12 | NC | $2,870 | 33.8 | ||
13 | NC | $2,846 | 33.7 | ||
14 | NC | $2,831 | 33.6 | ||
15 | NC | $2,803 | 33.4 | ||
16 | NC | $2,610 | 32.5 | ||
17 | NC | $2,265 | 30.8 | ||
18 | NC | $2,252 | 30.7 | ||
19 | NC | $1,571 | 27.2 | ||
20 | NC | $4 | 16.8 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Hurricane
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $160,565 | 69.9 | ||
2 | NC | $142,563 | 68.3 | ||
3 | NC | $131,644 | 67.1 | ||
4 | NC | $104,957 | 63.7 | ||
5 | NC | $103,653 | 63.5 | ||
6 | NC | $92,861 | 62.0 | ||
7 | NC | $86,095 | 60.9 | ||
8 | NC | $84,917 | 60.8 | ||
9 | NC | $78,986 | 59.8 | ||
10 | NC | $73,367 | 58.8 | ||
11 | NC | $70,910 | 58.4 | ||
12 | NC | $69,220 | 58.1 | ||
13 | NC | $61,576 | 56.7 | ||
14 | NC | $56,902 | 55.9 | ||
15 | NC | $54,423 | 55.4 | ||
16 | NC | $54,256 | 55.4 | ||
17 | NC | $50,312 | 54.6 | ||
18 | NC | $39,132 | 52.1 | ||
19 | NC | $34,192 | 50.9 | ||
20 | NC | $31,628 | 50.1 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Ice Storm
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $36,799 | 92.6 | ||
2 | NC | $33,040 | 91.7 | ||
3 | NC | $28,238 | 90.2 | ||
4 | NC | $25,653 | 89.3 | ||
5 | NC | $24,694 | 89.0 | ||
6 | NC | $23,369 | 88.4 | ||
7 | NC | $22,583 | 88.1 | ||
8 | NC | $21,300 | 87.5 | ||
9 | NC | $19,751 | 86.7 | ||
10 | NC | $19,001 | 86.3 | ||
11 | NC | $17,553 | 85.4 | ||
12 | NC | $16,530 | 84.7 | ||
13 | NC | $15,605 | 84.0 | ||
14 | NC | $15,405 | 83.9 | ||
15 | NC | $14,139 | 82.9 | ||
16 | NC | $12,441 | 81.3 | ||
17 | NC | $11,638 | 80.5 | ||
18 | NC | $10,551 | 79.0 | ||
19 | NC | $10,048 | 78.3 | ||
20 | NC | $9,833 | 78.0 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Landslide
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $3,126 | 84.5 | ||
2 | NC | $2,065 | 77.6 | ||
3 | NC | $2,005 | 77.1 | ||
4 | NC | $1,740 | 74.6 | ||
5 | NC | $1,705 | 74.3 | ||
6 | NC | $1,557 | 72.6 | ||
7 | NC | $1,006 | 65.4 | ||
8 | NC | $573 | 57.7 | ||
9 | NC | $427 | 54.5 | ||
10 | NC | $317 | 51.7 | ||
11 | NC | $312 | 51.6 | ||
12 | NC | $298 | 51.3 | ||
13 | NC | $296 | 51.2 | ||
14 | NC | $270 | 50.5 | ||
15 | NC | $6 | 39.8 | ||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
NC | $0 | 0.0 | |||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Lightning
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $19,646 | 86.2 | ||
2 | NC | $14,052 | 77.7 | ||
3 | NC | $13,945 | 77.5 | ||
4 | NC | $13,778 | 77.1 | ||
5 | NC | $13,595 | 76.8 | ||
6 | NC | $13,043 | 75.5 | ||
7 | NC | $12,869 | 75.1 | ||
8 | NC | $12,581 | 74.4 | ||
9 | NC | $12,498 | 74.2 | ||
10 | NC | $11,970 | 73.0 | ||
11 | NC | $10,675 | 69.5 | ||
12 | NC | $10,515 | 69.0 | ||
13 | NC | $10,063 | 67.7 | ||
14 | NC | $9,172 | 64.8 | ||
15 | NC | $8,992 | 64.2 | ||
16 | NC | $8,397 | 62.0 | ||
17 | NC | $7,736 | 59.4 | ||
18 | NC | $7,569 | 58.7 | ||
19 | NC | $6,191 | 52.7 | ||
20 | NC | $3,562 | 38.1 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Riverine Flooding
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $30,659 | 71.0 | ||
2 | NC | $21,970 | 66.1 | ||
3 | NC | $21,786 | 66.0 | ||
4 | NC | $21,077 | 65.4 | ||
5 | NC | $18,710 | 63.6 | ||
6 | NC | $15,350 | 60.7 | ||
7 | NC | $15,084 | 60.4 | ||
8 | NC | $13,993 | 59.4 | ||
9 | NC | $7,396 | 51.0 | ||
10 | NC | $7,098 | 50.4 | ||
11 | NC | $4,556 | 45.3 | ||
12 | NC | $3,976 | 43.9 | ||
13 | NC | $2,878 | 40.6 | ||
14 | NC | $2,007 | 37.8 | ||
15 | NC | $1,234 | 34.7 | ||
16 | NC | $989 | 33.6 | ||
17 | NC | $971 | 33.4 | ||
18 | NC | $362 | 29.9 | ||
19 | NC | $240 | 28.9 | ||
20 | NC | $0 | 25.2 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Strong Wind
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $16,051 | 62.4 | ||
2 | NC | $14,770 | 60.5 | ||
3 | NC | $14,380 | 59.9 | ||
4 | NC | $13,416 | 58.3 | ||
5 | NC | $12,931 | 57.4 | ||
6 | NC | $12,167 | 56.1 | ||
7 | NC | $12,123 | 56.0 | ||
8 | NC | $11,962 | 55.7 | ||
9 | NC | $11,683 | 55.2 | ||
10 | NC | $11,413 | 54.7 | ||
11 | NC | $10,820 | 53.5 | ||
12 | NC | $10,289 | 52.4 | ||
13 | NC | $9,846 | 51.5 | ||
14 | NC | $9,834 | 51.5 | ||
15 | NC | $9,715 | 51.2 | ||
16 | NC | $9,548 | 50.9 | ||
17 | NC | $8,412 | 48.3 | ||
18 | NC | $7,969 | 47.2 | ||
19 | NC | $6,010 | 41.9 | ||
20 | NC | $3,131 | 31.9 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Tornado
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $190,883 | 77.3 | ||
2 | NC | $147,964 | 70.8 | ||
3 | NC | $142,209 | 69.9 | ||
4 | NC | $136,725 | 68.9 | ||
5 | NC | $134,632 | 68.6 | ||
6 | NC | $129,774 | 67.8 | ||
7 | NC | $120,084 | 66.0 | ||
8 | NC | $118,953 | 65.8 | ||
9 | NC | $118,789 | 65.8 | ||
10 | NC | $118,745 | 65.8 | ||
11 | NC | $113,914 | 64.9 | ||
12 | NC | $113,726 | 64.9 | ||
13 | NC | $104,993 | 63.2 | ||
14 | NC | $102,992 | 62.8 | ||
15 | NC | $98,644 | 62.0 | ||
16 | NC | $98,483 | 62.0 | ||
17 | NC | $90,679 | 60.3 | ||
18 | NC | $85,619 | 59.2 | ||
19 | NC | $80,948 | 58.1 | ||
20 | NC | $77,004 | 57.1 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Tsunami
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Volcanic Activity
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
NC | N/A | ||||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Wildfire
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $3,960 | 79.7 | ||
2 | NC | $3,688 | 79.3 | ||
3 | NC | $3,337 | 78.7 | ||
4 | NC | $2,604 | 77.0 | ||
5 | NC | $2,485 | 76.6 | ||
6 | NC | $2,385 | 76.2 | ||
7 | NC | $1,898 | 74.0 | ||
8 | NC | $1,777 | 73.3 | ||
9 | NC | $1,739 | 73.0 | ||
10 | NC | $1,699 | 72.7 | ||
11 | NC | $1,518 | 71.3 | ||
12 | NC | $1,429 | 70.6 | ||
13 | NC | $1,401 | 70.3 | ||
14 | NC | $1,362 | 70.0 | ||
15 | NC | $945 | 64.8 | ||
16 | NC | $872 | 63.8 | ||
17 | NC | $871 | 63.8 | ||
18 | NC | $713 | 60.9 | ||
19 | NC | $618 | 58.9 | ||
20 | NC | $484 | 55.5 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Winter Weather
Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | $1,460 | 51.7 | ||
2 | NC | $1,029 | 45.3 | ||
3 | NC | $988 | 44.6 | ||
4 | NC | $985 | 44.5 | ||
5 | NC | $980 | 44.4 | ||
6 | NC | $945 | 43.8 | ||
7 | NC | $874 | 42.6 | ||
8 | NC | $856 | 42.3 | ||
9 | NC | $853 | 42.2 | ||
10 | NC | $804 | 41.3 | ||
11 | NC | $803 | 41.3 | ||
12 | NC | $782 | 40.9 | ||
13 | NC | $776 | 40.8 | ||
14 | NC | $717 | 39.6 | ||
15 | NC | $660 | 38.4 | ||
16 | NC | $657 | 38.4 | ||
17 | NC | $629 | 37.8 | ||
18 | NC | $583 | 36.8 | ||
19 | NC | $510 | 35.2 | ||
20 | NC | $483 | 34.6 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Social Vulnerability
Social Vulnerability measures the susceptibility of social groups to the adverse impacts of natural hazards, including disproportionate death, injury, loss, or disruption of livelihood.
Social Vulnerability Legend
Rank | Community | State | Rating | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Very High | 97.2 | ||
2 | NC | Very High | 96.7 | ||
3 | NC | Very High | 96.0 | ||
4 | NC | Very High | 95.0 | ||
5 | NC | Very High | 94.6 | ||
6 | NC | Very High | 94.5 | ||
7 | NC | Very High | 93.4 | ||
8 | NC | Very High | 88.1 | ||
9 | NC | Very High | 87.8 | ||
10 | NC | Very High | 83.4 | ||
11 | NC | Relatively High | 80.0 | ||
12 | NC | Relatively High | 78.3 | ||
13 | NC | Relatively High | 68.1 | ||
14 | NC | Relatively High | 63.8 | ||
15 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 59.4 | ||
16 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 53.4 | ||
17 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 48.9 | ||
18 | NC | Relatively Moderate | 42.5 | ||
19 | NC | Relatively Low | 35.9 | ||
20 | NC | Relatively Low | 32.5 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
Community Resilience
Community Resilience measures a County's ability to prepare for anticipated natural hazards, adapt to changing conditions, and withstand and recover rapidly from disruptions.
Community Resilience Legend
Rank | Community | State | Rating | Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
1 | NC | Relatively Low | 37.5 | ||
285 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
About the National Risk Index
The National Risk Index is a dataset and online tool to help illustrate the United States communities most at risk for 18 natural hazards: Avalanche, Coastal Flooding, Cold Wave, Drought, Earthquake, Hail, Heat Wave, Hurricane, Ice Storm, Landslide, Lightning, Riverine Flooding, Strong Wind, Tornado, Tsunami, Volcanic Activity, Wildfire, and Winter Weather.
The National Risk Index leverages available source data for Expected Annual Loss due to these 18 hazard types, Social Vulnerability, and Community Resilience to develop a baseline relative risk measurement for each United States county and Census tract. These measurements are calculated using average past conditions, but they cannot be used to predict future outcomes for a community. The National Risk Index is intended to fill gaps in available data and analyses to better inform federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial decision makers as they develop risk reduction strategies.
Explore the National Risk Index Map at hazards.fema.gov/nri/map.
Visit the National Risk Index website at hazards.fema.gov/nri/learn-more to access supporting documentation and links.
Calculating the Risk Index
Risk Index scores are calculated using an equation that combines scores for Expected Annual Loss due to natural hazards, Social Vulnerability and Community Resilience:
Risk Index = Expected Annual Loss × ÷ Community Resilience
Risk Index scores are presented as a composite score for all 18 hazard types, as well as individual scores for each hazard type.
For more information, visit hazards.fema.gov/nri/determining-risk.
Calculating Expected Annual Loss
Expected Annual Loss scores are calculated using an equation that combines values for exposure, annualized frequency, and historic loss ratios for 18 hazard types:
Expected Annual Loss = Exposure × Annualized Frequency × Historic Loss Ratio
Expected Annual Loss scores are presented as a composite score for all 18 hazard types, as well as individual scores for each hazard type.
For more information, visit hazards.fema.gov/nri/expected-annual-loss.
Calculating Social Vulnerability
Social Vulnerability is measured using the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
For more information, visit hazards.fema.gov/nri/social-vulnerability.
Calculating Community Resilience
Community Resilience is measured at the County level using the Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities (HVRI BRIC) published by the University of South Carolina's Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute (HVRI).
For more information, visit hazards.fema.gov/nri/community-resilience.
How to Take Action
There are many ways to reduce natural hazard risk through mitigation. Communities with high National Risk Index scores can take action to reduce risk by decreasing Expected Annual Loss due to natural hazards, decreasing Social Vulnerability, and increasing Community Resilience.
For information about how to take action and reduce your risk, visit hazards.fema.gov/nri/take-action.
Disclaimer
The National Risk Index (the Risk Index or the Index) and its associated data are meant for planning purposes only. This tool was created for broad nationwide comparisons and is not a substitute for localized risk assessment analysis. Nationwide datasets used as inputs for the National Risk Index are, in many cases, not as accurate as available local data. Users with access to local data for each National Risk Index risk factor should consider substituting the Risk Index data with local data to recalculate a more accurate risk index. If you decide to download the National Risk Index data and substitute it with local data, you assume responsibility for the accuracy of the data and any resulting data index. Please visit the Contact Us page if you would like to discuss this process further.
The methodology used by the National Risk Index has been reviewed by subject matter experts in the fields of natural hazard risk research, risk analysis, mitigation planning, and emergency management. The processing methods used to create the National Risk Index have produced results similar to those from other natural hazard risk analyses conducted on a smaller scale. The breadth and combination of geographic information systems (GIS) and data processing techniques leveraged by the National Risk Index enable it to incorporate multiple hazard types and risk factors, manage its nationwide scope, and capture what might have been missed using other methods.
The National Risk Index does not consider the intricate economic and physical interdependencies that exist across geographic regions. Keep in mind that hazard impacts in surrounding counties or Census tracts can cause indirect losses in your community regardless of your community's risk profile.
Nationwide data available for some risk factors are rudimentary at this time. The National Risk Index will be continuously updated as new data become available and improved methodologies are identified.
The National Risk Index Contact Us page is available at hazards.fema.gov/nri/contact-us.