Risk Index
Expected Annual Loss
Social Vulnerability
Community Resilience
About the National Risk Index
How to Take Action
Only the 20 highest-risk communities are shown. 156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
May 21, 2024
Risk Comparison Report
Use this report to determine how risk factors in selected communities compare to each other. Click a community name in any table below to open an individual risk profile report for that community and review its risk factors in more detail.
While reviewing this report, keep in mind that low risk is driven by lower loss due to natural hazards, lower social vulnerability, and higher community resilience.
For more information about the National Risk Index, its data, and how to interpret the information it provides, please review the About the National Risk Index and How to Take Action sections at the end of this report. Or, visit the National Risk Index website at hazards.fema.gov/nri/learn-more to access supporting documentation and links.
Note:
This report includes information about only the 20 highest-risk communities selected. The following 156 communities were originally selected but have been excluded from this report:
Census tract 35001000107, Census tract 35001000108, Census tract 35001000109, Census tract 35001000110, Census tract 35001000111, Census tract 35001000112, Census tract 35001000113, Census tract 35001000114, Census tract 35001000115, Census tract 35001000116, Census tract 35001000117, Census tract 35001000118, Census tract 35001000119, Census tract 35001000120, Census tract 35001000121, Census tract 35001000122, Census tract 35001000123, Census tract 35001000124, Census tract 35001000125, Census tract 35001000126, Census tract 35001000127, Census tract 35001000128, Census tract 35001000129, Census tract 35001000203, Census tract 35001000204, Census tract 35001000205, Census tract 35001000206, Census tract 35001000207, Census tract 35001000208, Census tract 35001000300, Census tract 35001000401, Census tract 35001000402, Census tract 35001000501, Census tract 35001000503, Census tract 35001000504, Census tract 35001000601, Census tract 35001000603, Census tract 35001000605, Census tract 35001000704, Census tract 35001000711, Census tract 35001000712, Census tract 35001000713, Census tract 35001000714, Census tract 35001000715, Census tract 35001000716, Census tract 35001000717, Census tract 35001000718, Census tract 35001000719, Census tract 35001000720, Census tract 35001000904, Census tract 35001000905, Census tract 35001000907, Census tract 35001000908, Census tract 35001001101, Census tract 35001001102, Census tract 35001001201, Census tract 35001001300, Census tract 35001001400, Census tract 35001001500, Census tract 35001001701, Census tract 35001001702, Census tract 35001002200, Census tract 35001002301, Census tract 35001002302, Census tract 35001002303, Census tract 35001002401, Census tract 35001002403, Census tract 35001002404, Census tract 35001003002, Census tract 35001003100, Census tract 35001003600, Census tract 35001003707, Census tract 35001003712, Census tract 35001003715, Census tract 35001003717, Census tract 35001003718, Census tract 35001003719, Census tract 35001003722, Census tract 35001003723, Census tract 35001003724, Census tract 35001003725, Census tract 35001003726, Census tract 35001003728, Census tract 35001003729, Census tract 35001003730, Census tract 35001003731, Census tract 35001003737, Census tract 35001003738, Census tract 35001003739, Census tract 35001003740, Census tract 35001003741, Census tract 35001003742, Census tract 35001003743, Census tract 35001003744, Census tract 35001003745, Census tract 35001003746, Census tract 35001003803, Census tract 35001003804, Census tract 35001003805, Census tract 35001003806, Census tract 35001003807, Census tract 35001004300, Census tract 35001004401, Census tract 35001004402, Census tract 35001004501, Census tract 35001004502, Census tract 35001004602, Census tract 35001004604, Census tract 35001004712, Census tract 35001004713, Census tract 35001004715, Census tract 35001004720, Census tract 35001004722, Census tract 35001004723, Census tract 35001004724, Census tract 35001004725, Census tract 35001004726, Census tract 35001004727, Census tract 35001004728, Census tract 35001004729, Census tract 35001004733, Census tract 35001004734, Census tract 35001004735, Census tract 35001004736, Census tract 35001004737, Census tract 35001004738, Census tract 35001004739, Census tract 35001004742, Census tract 35001004743, Census tract 35001004744, Census tract 35001004745, Census tract 35001004747, Census tract 35001004749, Census tract 35001004750, Census tract 35001004752, Census tract 35001004753, Census tract 35001004754, Census tract 35001004755, Census tract 35001004756, Census tract 35001004757, Census tract 35001004758, Census tract 35001004759, Census tract 35001004760, Census tract 35001004761, Census tract 35001004762, Census tract 35001004763, Census tract 35001004764, Census tract 35001940500, Census tract 35001940601, Census tract 35001940602, Census tract 35001940700, Census tract 35001940800, Census tract 35001980000, Census tract 35001980300, Census tract 35001980500, Census tract 35001980600
Risk Index
Risk Index Legend
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | Relatively High | 87.2 | ||
| 2 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 85.22 | ||
| 3 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 82.36 | ||
| 4 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 81.33 | ||
| 5 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 75.99 | ||
| 6 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 75.83 | ||
| 7 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 70.57 | ||
| 8 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 70.3 | ||
| 9 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 68.1 | ||
| 10 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 65.54 | ||
| 11 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 62.67 | ||
| 12 | NM | Relatively Low | 60.69 | ||
| 13 | NM | Relatively Low | 59.51 | ||
| 14 | NM | Relatively Low | 55.13 | ||
| 15 | NM | Relatively Low | 50.27 | ||
| 16 | NM | Relatively Low | 49.43 | ||
| 17 | NM | Relatively Low | 49.33 | ||
| 18 | NM | Relatively Low | 46.54 | ||
| 19 | NM | Relatively Low | 45.86 | ||
| 20 | NM | Relatively Low | 43.2 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $1,455,751 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | $2,008,570 | 87.2 | |
| 2 | NM | $1,168,130 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | $1,802,599 | 85.22 | |
| 3 | NM | $1,180,051 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $1,580,947 | 82.36 | |
| 4 | NM | $1,124,559 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $1,511,695 | 81.33 | |
| 5 | NM | $724,407 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | $1,212,105 | 75.99 | |
| 6 | NM | $747,275 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | $1,204,777 | 75.83 | |
| 7 | NM | $674,710 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $995,820 | 70.57 | |
| 8 | NM | $558,984 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | $987,566 | 70.3 | |
| 9 | NM | $626,676 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | $915,173 | 68.1 | |
| 10 | NM | $557,142 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $843,766 | 65.54 | |
| 11 | NM | $552,300 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $770,096 | 62.67 | |
| 12 | NM | $481,944 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $724,821 | 60.69 | |
| 13 | NM | $490,771 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | $698,845 | 59.51 | |
| 14 | NM | $392,046 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $614,047 | 55.13 | |
| 15 | NM | $466,248 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $535,278 | 50.27 | |
| 16 | NM | $351,840 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $522,380 | 49.43 | |
| 17 | NM | $292,437 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | $521,151 | 49.33 | |
| 18 | NM | $346,795 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $483,041 | 46.54 | |
| 19 | NM | $522,579 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | $474,508 | 45.86 | |
| 20 | NM | $334,649 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | $440,885 | 43.2 | |
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Hazard Type Risk Index
Hazard type Risk Index scores are calculated using data for only a single hazard type, and reflect a community's relative risk for only that hazard type.
Avalanche
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | N/A | N/A | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Coastal Flooding
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | N/A | N/A | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Cold Wave
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $0 | 0 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Drought
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 96.99 | ||
| 2 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 96.73 | ||
| 3 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 95.7 | ||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $39,827 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | $66,640 | 96.99 | |
| 2 | NM | $37,448 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | $57,788 | 96.73 | |
| 3 | NM | $29,139 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | $38,389 | 95.7 | |
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $0 | 0 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Earthquake
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | Relatively High | 96.01 | ||
| 2 | NM | Relatively High | 94.94 | ||
| 3 | NM | Relatively High | 94.36 | ||
| 4 | NM | Relatively High | 94.13 | ||
| 5 | NM | Relatively High | 91.53 | ||
| 6 | NM | Relatively High | 90.91 | ||
| 7 | NM | Relatively High | 90.87 | ||
| 8 | NM | Relatively High | 90.66 | ||
| 9 | NM | Relatively High | 90.13 | ||
| 10 | NM | Relatively High | 89.57 | ||
| 11 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 88.7 | ||
| 12 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 88.51 | ||
| 13 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 88.38 | ||
| 14 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 87.7 | ||
| 15 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 86.8 | ||
| 16 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 86.49 | ||
| 17 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 86.48 | ||
| 18 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 86.04 | ||
| 19 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 85.51 | ||
| 20 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 83.95 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $1,422,040 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | $1,962,057 | 96.01 | |
| 2 | NM | $1,075,912 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | $1,660,293 | 94.94 | |
| 3 | NM | $1,145,145 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $1,534,183 | 94.36 | |
| 4 | NM | $1,102,709 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $1,482,323 | 94.13 | |
| 5 | NM | $646,110 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | $1,041,676 | 91.53 | |
| 6 | NM | $572,892 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | $958,584 | 90.91 | |
| 7 | NM | $644,517 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $951,257 | 90.87 | |
| 8 | NM | $524,282 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | $926,257 | 90.66 | |
| 9 | NM | $591,093 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | $863,209 | 90.13 | |
| 10 | NM | $524,333 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $794,078 | 89.57 | |
| 11 | NM | $465,517 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $700,115 | 88.7 | |
| 12 | NM | $488,372 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $680,958 | 88.51 | |
| 13 | NM | $468,777 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | $667,526 | 88.38 | |
| 14 | NM | $378,904 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $593,463 | 87.7 | |
| 15 | NM | $443,298 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $508,930 | 86.8 | |
| 16 | NM | $327,743 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $486,603 | 86.49 | |
| 17 | NM | $272,360 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | $485,372 | 86.48 | |
| 18 | NM | $322,612 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $449,358 | 86.04 | |
| 19 | NM | $449,134 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | $407,820 | 85.51 | |
| 20 | NM | $228,416 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | $300,928 | 83.95 | |
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Hail
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 80.83 | ||
| 2 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 77.08 | ||
| 3 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 75.57 | ||
| 4 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 74.1 | ||
| 5 | NM | Relatively Low | 70.94 | ||
| 6 | NM | Relatively Low | 69.83 | ||
| 7 | NM | Relatively Low | 69.82 | ||
| 8 | NM | Relatively Low | 69.2 | ||
| 9 | NM | Relatively Low | 68.78 | ||
| 10 | NM | Relatively Low | 68.68 | ||
| 11 | NM | Relatively Low | 68.34 | ||
| 12 | NM | Relatively Low | 66.75 | ||
| 13 | NM | Relatively Low | 66.7 | ||
| 14 | NM | Relatively Low | 66.04 | ||
| 15 | NM | Relatively Low | 64.87 | ||
| 16 | NM | Relatively Low | 64.57 | ||
| 17 | NM | Relatively Low | 63.85 | ||
| 18 | NM | Relatively Low | 62.93 | ||
| 19 | NM | Relatively Low | 61.73 | ||
| 20 | NM | Relatively Low | 58 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $14,251 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | $21,992 | 80.83 | |
| 2 | NM | $11,410 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $15,286 | 77.08 | |
| 3 | NM | $8,030 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | $13,436 | 75.57 | |
| 4 | NM | $6,704 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | $11,844 | 74.1 | |
| 5 | NM | $6,559 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | $9,050 | 70.94 | |
| 6 | NM | $5,440 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $8,239 | 69.83 | |
| 7 | NM | $5,103 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | $8,227 | 69.82 | |
| 8 | NM | $5,819 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $7,822 | 69.2 | |
| 9 | NM | $5,413 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $7,547 | 68.78 | |
| 10 | NM | $5,069 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $7,482 | 68.68 | |
| 11 | NM | $4,971 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | $7,259 | 68.34 | |
| 12 | NM | $4,541 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $6,325 | 66.75 | |
| 13 | NM | $3,531 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | $6,293 | 66.7 | |
| 14 | NM | $3,946 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $5,935 | 66.04 | |
| 15 | NM | $3,762 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | $5,357 | 64.87 | |
| 16 | NM | $5,757 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | $5,227 | 64.57 | |
| 17 | NM | $4,274 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $4,907 | 63.85 | |
| 18 | NM | $3,063 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $4,547 | 62.93 | |
| 19 | NM | $2,630 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $4,119 | 61.73 | |
| 20 | NM | $2,362 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | $3,111 | 58 | |
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Heat Wave
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $0 | 0 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Hurricane
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | N/A | N/A | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Ice Storm
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | Very Low | 23.4 | ||
| 2 | NM | Very Low | 18.99 | ||
| 3 | NM | Very Low | 18.16 | ||
| 4 | NM | Very Low | 17.37 | ||
| 5 | NM | Very Low | 13.5 | ||
| 6 | NM | Very Low | 13.37 | ||
| 7 | NM | Very Low | 13.36 | ||
| 8 | NM | Very Low | 13.14 | ||
| 9 | NM | Very Low | 12.55 | ||
| 10 | NM | Very Low | 12.31 | ||
| 11 | NM | Very Low | 12.27 | ||
| 12 | NM | Very Low | 11.58 | ||
| 13 | NM | Very Low | 11.1 | ||
| 14 | NM | Very Low | 10.18 | ||
| 15 | NM | Very Low | 10.15 | ||
| 16 | NM | Very Low | 10.09 | ||
| 17 | NM | Very Low | 9.55 | ||
| 18 | NM | Very Low | 8.03 | ||
| 19 | NM | Very Low | 7.93 | ||
| 20 | NM | Very Low | 7.08 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $542 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | $837 | 23.4 | |
| 2 | NM | $374 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | $626 | 18.99 | |
| 3 | NM | $438 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $586 | 18.16 | |
| 4 | NM | $314 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | $555 | 17.37 | |
| 5 | NM | $277 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | $405 | 13.5 | |
| 6 | NM | $264 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $399 | 13.37 | |
| 7 | NM | $286 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $399 | 13.36 | |
| 8 | NM | $242 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | $390 | 13.14 | |
| 9 | NM | $267 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | $369 | 12.55 | |
| 10 | NM | $244 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $360 | 12.31 | |
| 11 | NM | $267 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $359 | 12.27 | |
| 12 | NM | $188 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | $336 | 11.58 | |
| 13 | NM | $229 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $319 | 11.1 | |
| 14 | NM | $194 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $288 | 10.18 | |
| 15 | NM | $202 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | $287 | 10.15 | |
| 16 | NM | $190 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $285 | 10.09 | |
| 17 | NM | $294 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | $267 | 9.55 | |
| 18 | NM | $191 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $219 | 8.03 | |
| 19 | NM | $138 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $215 | 7.93 | |
| 20 | NM | $144 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | $190 | 7.08 | |
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Landslide
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | Relatively High | 96.79 | ||
| 2 | NM | Relatively High | 95.58 | ||
| 3 | NM | Relatively High | 94.16 | ||
| 4 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 91.57 | ||
| 5 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 89.39 | ||
| 6 | NM | Relatively Low | 57.27 | ||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $8,693 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | $11,994 | 96.79 | |
| 2 | NM | $6,229 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $9,434 | 95.58 | |
| 3 | NM | $4,967 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | $7,665 | 94.16 | |
| 4 | NM | $3,936 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $5,809 | 91.57 | |
| 5 | NM | $2,865 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | $4,794 | 89.39 | |
| 6 | NM | $442 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | $582 | 57.27 | |
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $0 | 0 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Lightning
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 62.9 | ||
| 2 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 61.78 | ||
| 3 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 59.83 | ||
| 4 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 59.25 | ||
| 5 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 58.15 | ||
| 6 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 52.28 | ||
| 7 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 50.53 | ||
| 8 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 50.47 | ||
| 9 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 49.82 | ||
| 10 | NM | Relatively Low | 47.06 | ||
| 11 | NM | Relatively Low | 46.37 | ||
| 12 | NM | Relatively Low | 45.41 | ||
| 13 | NM | Relatively Low | 44.47 | ||
| 14 | NM | Relatively Low | 44.46 | ||
| 15 | NM | Relatively Low | 42.53 | ||
| 16 | NM | Relatively Low | 40.01 | ||
| 17 | NM | Relatively Low | 39.88 | ||
| 18 | NM | Relatively Low | 34.68 | ||
| 19 | NM | Relatively Low | 33.46 | ||
| 20 | NM | Relatively Low | 32.04 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $5,330 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | $9,417 | 62.9 | |
| 2 | NM | $6,206 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | $9,063 | 61.78 | |
| 3 | NM | $6,087 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $8,488 | 59.83 | |
| 4 | NM | $4,977 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | $8,327 | 59.25 | |
| 5 | NM | $4,497 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | $8,014 | 58.15 | |
| 6 | NM | $4,418 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $6,560 | 52.28 | |
| 7 | NM | $4,083 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $6,183 | 50.53 | |
| 8 | NM | $3,827 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | $6,170 | 50.47 | |
| 9 | NM | $4,234 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | $6,030 | 49.82 | |
| 10 | NM | $3,691 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $5,447 | 47.06 | |
| 11 | NM | $5,843 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | $5,305 | 46.37 | |
| 12 | NM | $3,321 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | $5,125 | 45.41 | |
| 13 | NM | $3,283 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $4,937 | 44.47 | |
| 14 | NM | $3,544 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $4,936 | 44.46 | |
| 15 | NM | $3,409 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $4,583 | 42.53 | |
| 16 | NM | $2,649 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $4,149 | 40.01 | |
| 17 | NM | $3,134 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | $4,129 | 39.88 | |
| 18 | NM | $2,873 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $3,298 | 34.68 | |
| 19 | NM | $2,326 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $3,117 | 33.46 | |
| 20 | NM | $2,113 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | $2,915 | 32.04 | |
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Riverine Flooding
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 87.52 | ||
| 2 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 81.64 | ||
| 3 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 77.3 | ||
| 4 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 75.52 | ||
| 5 | NM | Relatively Low | 62.94 | ||
| 6 | NM | Relatively Low | 60.16 | ||
| 7 | NM | Relatively Low | 58.13 | ||
| 8 | NM | Relatively Low | 53.98 | ||
| 9 | NM | Relatively Low | 52 | ||
| 10 | NM | Relatively Low | 49.41 | ||
| 11 | NM | Relatively Low | 49.02 | ||
| 12 | NM | Relatively Low | 48.36 | ||
| 13 | NM | Relatively Low | 47.22 | ||
| 14 | NM | Relatively Low | 46.68 | ||
| 15 | NM | Relatively Low | 45.87 | ||
| 16 | NM | Relatively Low | 43.45 | ||
| 17 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.77 | ||
| 18 | NM | Very Low | 33.22 | ||
| 19 | NM | Very Low | 28.55 | ||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $79,701 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | $128,496 | 87.52 | |
| 2 | NM | $44,392 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | $74,279 | 81.64 | |
| 3 | NM | $37,856 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $52,785 | 77.3 | |
| 4 | NM | $34,992 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | $46,101 | 75.52 | |
| 5 | NM | $21,075 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | $19,137 | 62.94 | |
| 6 | NM | $10,773 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | $15,732 | 60.16 | |
| 7 | NM | $7,725 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | $13,648 | 58.13 | |
| 8 | NM | $6,803 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $10,100 | 53.98 | |
| 9 | NM | $5,839 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $8,617 | 52 | |
| 10 | NM | $4,533 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | $6,995 | 49.41 | |
| 11 | NM | $4,865 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $6,777 | 49.02 | |
| 12 | NM | $4,230 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $6,406 | 48.36 | |
| 13 | NM | $4,081 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | $5,812 | 47.22 | |
| 14 | NM | $4,016 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | $5,541 | 46.68 | |
| 15 | NM | $2,891 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | $5,152 | 45.87 | |
| 16 | NM | $3,581 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $4,112 | 43.45 | |
| 17 | NM | $1,197 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $1,875 | 36.77 | |
| 18 | NM | $747 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $1,001 | 33.22 | |
| 19 | NM | $144 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $217 | 28.55 | |
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $0 | 0 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Strong Wind
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | Very Low | 22.87 | ||
| 2 | NM | Very Low | 21.85 | ||
| 3 | NM | Very Low | 21.54 | ||
| 4 | NM | Very Low | 21.27 | ||
| 5 | NM | Very Low | 20.82 | ||
| 6 | NM | Very Low | 20.03 | ||
| 7 | NM | Very Low | 19.87 | ||
| 8 | NM | Very Low | 19.75 | ||
| 9 | NM | Very Low | 19.7 | ||
| 10 | NM | Very Low | 19.36 | ||
| 11 | NM | Very Low | 19.33 | ||
| 12 | NM | Very Low | 18.95 | ||
| 13 | NM | Very Low | 18.81 | ||
| 14 | NM | Very Low | 18.79 | ||
| 15 | NM | Very Low | 17.92 | ||
| 16 | NM | Very Low | 17.74 | ||
| 17 | NM | Very Low | 17.37 | ||
| 18 | NM | Very Low | 17 | ||
| 19 | NM | Very Low | 16.55 | ||
| 20 | NM | Very Low | 14.81 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $989 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | $1,655 | 22.87 | |
| 2 | NM | $820 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | $1,449 | 21.85 | |
| 3 | NM | $897 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | $1,384 | 21.54 | |
| 4 | NM | $910 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | $1,328 | 21.27 | |
| 5 | NM | $885 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $1,235 | 20.82 | |
| 6 | NM | $726 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $1,099 | 20.03 | |
| 7 | NM | $719 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $1,067 | 19.87 | |
| 8 | NM | $588 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | $1,047 | 19.75 | |
| 9 | NM | $646 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | $1,041 | 19.7 | |
| 10 | NM | $737 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $987 | 19.36 | |
| 11 | NM | $666 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $982 | 19.33 | |
| 12 | NM | $666 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $927 | 18.95 | |
| 13 | NM | $673 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $905 | 18.81 | |
| 14 | NM | $634 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | $903 | 18.79 | |
| 15 | NM | $875 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | $795 | 17.92 | |
| 16 | NM | $515 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $775 | 17.74 | |
| 17 | NM | $531 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | $733 | 17.37 | |
| 18 | NM | $528 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | $696 | 17 | |
| 19 | NM | $419 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $657 | 16.55 | |
| 20 | NM | $461 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $529 | 14.81 | |
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Tornado
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 40.69 | ||
| 2 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.52 | ||
| 3 | NM | Relatively Low | 35.24 | ||
| 4 | NM | Relatively Low | 34.82 | ||
| 5 | NM | Relatively Low | 30.82 | ||
| 6 | NM | Relatively Low | 30.57 | ||
| 7 | NM | Relatively Low | 30.47 | ||
| 8 | NM | Relatively Low | 30.16 | ||
| 9 | NM | Very Low | 29.29 | ||
| 10 | NM | Very Low | 29.21 | ||
| 11 | NM | Very Low | 29.1 | ||
| 12 | NM | Very Low | 28.42 | ||
| 13 | NM | Very Low | 27.69 | ||
| 14 | NM | Very Low | 26.53 | ||
| 15 | NM | Very Low | 26.35 | ||
| 16 | NM | Very Low | 26.1 | ||
| 17 | NM | Very Low | 25.2 | ||
| 18 | NM | Very Low | 22.01 | ||
| 19 | NM | Very Low | 21.95 | ||
| 20 | NM | Very Low | 20.06 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $22,998 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | $35,489 | 40.69 | |
| 2 | NM | $16,305 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | $27,282 | 36.52 | |
| 3 | NM | $18,563 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $24,869 | 35.24 | |
| 4 | NM | $13,625 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | $24,072 | 34.82 | |
| 5 | NM | $12,218 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | $17,843 | 30.82 | |
| 6 | NM | $12,564 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $17,519 | 30.57 | |
| 7 | NM | $11,479 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $17,384 | 30.47 | |
| 8 | NM | $10,520 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | $16,961 | 30.16 | |
| 9 | NM | $11,429 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | $15,769 | 29.29 | |
| 10 | NM | $10,622 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $15,677 | 29.21 | |
| 11 | NM | $11,554 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $15,531 | 29.1 | |
| 12 | NM | $8,270 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | $14,739 | 28.42 | |
| 13 | NM | $9,999 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $13,928 | 27.69 | |
| 14 | NM | $8,640 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $12,828 | 26.53 | |
| 15 | NM | $8,867 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | $12,626 | 26.35 | |
| 16 | NM | $8,250 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $12,408 | 26.1 | |
| 17 | NM | $12,870 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | $11,686 | 25.2 | |
| 18 | NM | $8,252 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $9,473 | 22.01 | |
| 19 | NM | $6,030 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $9,444 | 21.95 | |
| 20 | NM | $6,415 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | $8,451 | 20.06 | |
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Tsunami
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | N/A | N/A | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Volcanic Activity
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
| NM | Not Applicable | ||||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | N/A | N/A | ||
| NM | N/A | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | N/A | N/A | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Wildfire
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 91.58 | ||
| 2 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 90.02 | ||
| 3 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 87.96 | ||
| 4 | NM | Relatively Low | 80.1 | ||
| 5 | NM | Relatively Low | 78.94 | ||
| 6 | NM | Relatively Low | 71.73 | ||
| 7 | NM | Relatively Low | 63.68 | ||
| 8 | NM | Relatively Low | 60.39 | ||
| 9 | NM | Very Low | 49.64 | ||
| 10 | NM | Very Low | 47.18 | ||
| 11 | NM | Very Low | 42.25 | ||
| 12 | NM | Very Low | 38.94 | ||
| 13 | NM | Very Low | 34.03 | ||
| 14 | NM | Very Low | 30.93 | ||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
| NM | No Rating | 0 | |||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $33,210 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | $55,568 | 91.58 | |
| 2 | NM | $28,782 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | $37,919 | 90.02 | |
| 3 | NM | $26,475 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | $24,040 | 87.96 | |
| 4 | NM | $2,961 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | $4,569 | 80.1 | |
| 5 | NM | $3,226 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $3,704 | 78.94 | |
| 6 | NM | $1,002 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | $1,616 | 71.73 | |
| 7 | NM | $654 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $912 | 63.68 | |
| 8 | NM | $541 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $725 | 60.39 | |
| 9 | NM | $221 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $334 | 49.64 | |
| 10 | NM | $199 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $277 | 47.18 | |
| 11 | NM | $122 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $182 | 42.25 | |
| 12 | NM | $94 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | $134 | 38.94 | |
| 13 | NM | $54 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | $78 | 34.03 | |
| 14 | NM | $28 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | $49 | 30.93 | |
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | $0 | 0 | ||
| NM | $0 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $0 | 0 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Winter Weather
| Rank | Community | State | Risk Index Rating | Risk Index Score | National Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 40.99 | ||
| 2 | NM | Relatively Low | 32.12 | ||
| 3 | NM | Relatively Low | 30.4 | ||
| 4 | NM | Relatively Low | 27.42 | ||
| 5 | NM | Relatively Low | 26.88 | ||
| 6 | NM | Relatively Low | 26.84 | ||
| 7 | NM | Relatively Low | 26.28 | ||
| 8 | NM | Relatively Low | 25.72 | ||
| 9 | NM | Relatively Low | 25.63 | ||
| 10 | NM | Relatively Low | 25.48 | ||
| 11 | NM | Relatively Low | 25.41 | ||
| 12 | NM | Relatively Low | 25.32 | ||
| 13 | NM | Relatively Low | 25.22 | ||
| 14 | NM | Relatively Low | 25.07 | ||
| 15 | NM | Very Low | 24.66 | ||
| 16 | NM | Very Low | 24.6 | ||
| 17 | NM | Very Low | 23.91 | ||
| 18 | NM | Very Low | 23.69 | ||
| 19 | NM | Very Low | 23.14 | ||
| 20 | NM | Very Low | 22.44 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Social Vulnerability | Community Resilience | CRF | Risk Value | Risk Index Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $546 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.67 | $914 | 40.99 | |
| 2 | NM | $300 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.54 | $463 | 32.12 | |
| 3 | NM | $295 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.32 | $389 | 30.4 | |
| 4 | NM | $156 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.77 | $276 | 27.42 | |
| 5 | NM | $175 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.46 | $255 | 26.88 | |
| 6 | NM | $181 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $253 | 26.84 | |
| 7 | NM | $255 | Relatively Low | Relatively Low | 0.91 | $232 | 26.28 | |
| 8 | NM | $138 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.51 | $209 | 25.72 | |
| 9 | NM | $138 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $205 | 25.63 | |
| 10 | NM | $124 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.61 | $200 | 25.48 | |
| 11 | NM | $111 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.78 | $198 | 25.41 | |
| 12 | NM | $140 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.39 | $195 | 25.32 | |
| 13 | NM | $143 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $192 | 25.22 | |
| 14 | NM | $127 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.48 | $187 | 25.07 | |
| 15 | NM | $128 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.34 | $173 | 24.66 | |
| 16 | NM | $120 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.42 | $171 | 24.6 | |
| 17 | NM | $98 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.5 | $148 | 23.91 | |
| 18 | NM | $102 | Relatively High | Relatively Low | 1.38 | $141 | 23.69 | |
| 19 | NM | $79 | Very High | Relatively Low | 1.57 | $124 | 23.14 | |
| 20 | NM | $91 | Relatively Moderate | Relatively Low | 1.15 | $105 | 22.44 | |
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
||||||||
Expected Annual Loss
Expected Annual Loss measures the expected loss each year due to natural hazards.
Expected Annual Loss Legend
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $1,455,751 | 83.92 | ||
| 2 | NM | $1,180,051 | 79.05 | ||
| 3 | NM | $1,168,130 | 78.79 | ||
| 4 | NM | $1,124,559 | 77.77 | ||
| 5 | NM | $747,275 | 65.45 | ||
| 6 | NM | $724,407 | 64.4 | ||
| 7 | NM | $674,710 | 61.82 | ||
| 8 | NM | $626,676 | 59.17 | ||
| 9 | NM | $558,984 | 54.98 | ||
| 10 | NM | $557,142 | 54.85 | ||
| 11 | NM | $552,300 | 54.52 | ||
| 12 | NM | $522,579 | 52.52 | ||
| 13 | NM | $490,771 | 50.09 | ||
| 14 | NM | $481,944 | 49.41 | ||
| 15 | NM | $466,248 | 48.1 | ||
| 16 | NM | $392,046 | 41.21 | ||
| 17 | NM | $351,840 | 36.99 | ||
| 18 | NM | $346,795 | 36.45 | ||
| 19 | NM | $334,649 | 35.18 | ||
| 20 | NM | $292,437 | 30.51 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Expected Annual Loss for Hazard Types
Expected Annual Loss scores for hazard types are calculated using data for only a single hazard type, and reflect a community's relative expected annual loss for only that hazard type.
Avalanche
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Coastal Flooding
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Cold Wave
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Drought
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $39,827 | 96.2 | ||
| 2 | NM | $37,448 | 96.1 | ||
| 3 | NM | $29,139 | 95.4 | ||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Earthquake
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $1,422,040 | 95.4 | ||
| 2 | NM | $1,145,145 | 93.7 | ||
| 3 | NM | $1,102,709 | 93.4 | ||
| 4 | NM | $1,075,912 | 93.2 | ||
| 5 | NM | $646,110 | 88.8 | ||
| 6 | NM | $644,517 | 88.8 | ||
| 7 | NM | $591,093 | 88.1 | ||
| 8 | NM | $572,892 | 87.9 | ||
| 9 | NM | $524,333 | 87.3 | ||
| 10 | NM | $524,282 | 87.3 | ||
| 11 | NM | $488,372 | 86.8 | ||
| 12 | NM | $468,777 | 86.5 | ||
| 13 | NM | $465,517 | 86.5 | ||
| 14 | NM | $449,134 | 86.3 | ||
| 15 | NM | $443,298 | 86.2 | ||
| 16 | NM | $378,904 | 85.2 | ||
| 17 | NM | $327,743 | 84.3 | ||
| 18 | NM | $322,612 | 84.2 | ||
| 19 | NM | $272,360 | 83.3 | ||
| 20 | NM | $228,416 | 82.4 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Hail
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $14,251 | 77.9 | ||
| 2 | NM | $11,410 | 75.4 | ||
| 3 | NM | $8,030 | 71.4 | ||
| 4 | NM | $6,704 | 69.2 | ||
| 5 | NM | $6,559 | 69.0 | ||
| 6 | NM | $5,819 | 67.6 | ||
| 7 | NM | $5,757 | 67.5 | ||
| 8 | NM | $5,440 | 66.8 | ||
| 9 | NM | $5,413 | 66.8 | ||
| 10 | NM | $5,103 | 66.1 | ||
| 11 | NM | $5,069 | 66.0 | ||
| 12 | NM | $4,971 | 65.8 | ||
| 13 | NM | $4,541 | 64.7 | ||
| 14 | NM | $4,274 | 64.0 | ||
| 15 | NM | $3,946 | 63.0 | ||
| 16 | NM | $3,762 | 62.4 | ||
| 17 | NM | $3,531 | 61.6 | ||
| 18 | NM | $3,063 | 59.7 | ||
| 19 | NM | $2,630 | 57.6 | ||
| 20 | NM | $2,362 | 56.0 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Heat Wave
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Hurricane
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Ice Storm
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $542 | 18.1 | ||
| 2 | NM | $438 | 15.4 | ||
| 3 | NM | $374 | 13.6 | ||
| 4 | NM | $314 | 11.8 | ||
| 5 | NM | $294 | 11.2 | ||
| 6 | NM | $286 | 11.0 | ||
| 7 | NM | $277 | 10.7 | ||
| 8 | NM | $267 | 10.3 | ||
| 9 | NM | $267 | 10.3 | ||
| 10 | NM | $264 | 10.2 | ||
| 11 | NM | $244 | 9.5 | ||
| 12 | NM | $242 | 9.4 | ||
| 13 | NM | $229 | 9.0 | ||
| 14 | NM | $202 | 8.0 | ||
| 15 | NM | $194 | 7.7 | ||
| 16 | NM | $191 | 7.6 | ||
| 17 | NM | $190 | 7.6 | ||
| 18 | NM | $188 | 7.5 | ||
| 19 | NM | $144 | 6.0 | ||
| 20 | NM | $138 | 5.8 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Landslide
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $8,693 | 95.9 | ||
| 2 | NM | $6,229 | 93.4 | ||
| 3 | NM | $4,967 | 91.0 | ||
| 4 | NM | $3,936 | 87.9 | ||
| 5 | NM | $2,865 | 83.0 | ||
| 6 | NM | $442 | 54.9 | ||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Lightning
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $6,206 | 52.7 | ||
| 2 | NM | $6,087 | 52.2 | ||
| 3 | NM | $5,843 | 51.0 | ||
| 4 | NM | $5,330 | 48.4 | ||
| 5 | NM | $4,977 | 46.5 | ||
| 6 | NM | $4,497 | 43.9 | ||
| 7 | NM | $4,418 | 43.4 | ||
| 8 | NM | $4,234 | 42.4 | ||
| 9 | NM | $4,083 | 41.4 | ||
| 10 | NM | $3,827 | 39.9 | ||
| 11 | NM | $3,691 | 39.0 | ||
| 12 | NM | $3,544 | 38.0 | ||
| 13 | NM | $3,409 | 37.1 | ||
| 14 | NM | $3,321 | 36.5 | ||
| 15 | NM | $3,283 | 36.3 | ||
| 16 | NM | $3,134 | 35.3 | ||
| 17 | NM | $2,873 | 33.4 | ||
| 18 | NM | $2,649 | 31.7 | ||
| 19 | NM | $2,326 | 29.1 | ||
| 20 | NM | $2,113 | 27.5 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Riverine Flooding
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $79,701 | 83.9 | ||
| 2 | NM | $44,392 | 76.4 | ||
| 3 | NM | $37,856 | 74.1 | ||
| 4 | NM | $34,992 | 72.9 | ||
| 5 | NM | $21,075 | 65.4 | ||
| 6 | NM | $10,773 | 55.8 | ||
| 7 | NM | $7,725 | 51.5 | ||
| 8 | NM | $6,803 | 49.9 | ||
| 9 | NM | $5,839 | 48.1 | ||
| 10 | NM | $4,865 | 46.0 | ||
| 11 | NM | $4,533 | 45.2 | ||
| 12 | NM | $4,230 | 44.5 | ||
| 13 | NM | $4,081 | 44.2 | ||
| 14 | NM | $4,016 | 44.0 | ||
| 15 | NM | $3,581 | 42.8 | ||
| 16 | NM | $2,891 | 40.7 | ||
| 17 | NM | $1,197 | 34.5 | ||
| 18 | NM | $747 | 32.3 | ||
| 19 | NM | $144 | 28.0 | ||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Strong Wind
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $989 | 21.2 | ||
| 2 | NM | $910 | 20.8 | ||
| 3 | NM | $897 | 20.7 | ||
| 4 | NM | $885 | 20.6 | ||
| 5 | NM | $875 | 20.5 | ||
| 6 | NM | $820 | 20.2 | ||
| 7 | NM | $737 | 19.6 | ||
| 8 | NM | $726 | 19.5 | ||
| 9 | NM | $719 | 19.5 | ||
| 10 | NM | $673 | 19.1 | ||
| 11 | NM | $666 | 19.0 | ||
| 12 | NM | $666 | 19.0 | ||
| 13 | NM | $646 | 18.8 | ||
| 14 | NM | $634 | 18.7 | ||
| 15 | NM | $588 | 18.2 | ||
| 16 | NM | $531 | 17.6 | ||
| 17 | NM | $528 | 17.5 | ||
| 18 | NM | $515 | 17.3 | ||
| 19 | NM | $461 | 16.5 | ||
| 20 | NM | $419 | 15.7 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Tornado
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $22,998 | 36.0 | ||
| 2 | NM | $18,563 | 33.0 | ||
| 3 | NM | $16,305 | 31.5 | ||
| 4 | NM | $13,625 | 29.4 | ||
| 5 | NM | $12,870 | 28.8 | ||
| 6 | NM | $12,564 | 28.5 | ||
| 7 | NM | $12,218 | 28.2 | ||
| 8 | NM | $11,554 | 27.6 | ||
| 9 | NM | $11,479 | 27.5 | ||
| 10 | NM | $11,429 | 27.4 | ||
| 11 | NM | $10,622 | 26.6 | ||
| 12 | NM | $10,520 | 26.5 | ||
| 13 | NM | $9,999 | 25.8 | ||
| 14 | NM | $8,867 | 24.2 | ||
| 15 | NM | $8,640 | 23.8 | ||
| 16 | NM | $8,270 | 23.2 | ||
| 17 | NM | $8,252 | 23.2 | ||
| 18 | NM | $8,250 | 23.2 | ||
| 19 | NM | $6,415 | 19.2 | ||
| 20 | NM | $6,030 | 18.2 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Tsunami
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Volcanic Activity
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
| NM | N/A | ||||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Wildfire
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $33,210 | 89.9 | ||
| 2 | NM | $28,782 | 89.3 | ||
| 3 | NM | $26,475 | 88.9 | ||
| 4 | NM | $3,226 | 78.5 | ||
| 5 | NM | $2,961 | 77.9 | ||
| 6 | NM | $1,002 | 65.6 | ||
| 7 | NM | $654 | 59.7 | ||
| 8 | NM | $541 | 57.0 | ||
| 9 | NM | $221 | 45.6 | ||
| 10 | NM | $199 | 44.3 | ||
| 11 | NM | $122 | 39.2 | ||
| 12 | NM | $94 | 36.6 | ||
| 13 | NM | $54 | 32.2 | ||
| 14 | NM | $28 | 29.0 | ||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
| NM | $0 | 0.0 | |||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Winter Weather
| Rank | Community | State | EAL Value | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | $546 | 36.0 | ||
| 2 | NM | $300 | 30.0 | ||
| 3 | NM | $295 | 29.9 | ||
| 4 | NM | $255 | 28.7 | ||
| 5 | NM | $181 | 26.4 | ||
| 6 | NM | $175 | 26.1 | ||
| 7 | NM | $156 | 25.5 | ||
| 8 | NM | $143 | 25.1 | ||
| 9 | NM | $140 | 25.0 | ||
| 10 | NM | $138 | 24.9 | ||
| 11 | NM | $138 | 24.9 | ||
| 12 | NM | $128 | 24.5 | ||
| 13 | NM | $127 | 24.5 | ||
| 14 | NM | $124 | 24.4 | ||
| 15 | NM | $120 | 24.2 | ||
| 16 | NM | $111 | 23.9 | ||
| 17 | NM | $102 | 23.6 | ||
| 18 | NM | $98 | 23.4 | ||
| 19 | NM | $91 | 23.1 | ||
| 20 | NM | $79 | 22.6 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Social Vulnerability
Social Vulnerability measures the susceptibility of social groups to the adverse impacts of natural hazards, including disproportionate death, injury, loss, or disruption of livelihood.
Social Vulnerability Legend
| Rank | Community | State | Rating | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | Very High | 99.3 | ||
| 2 | NM | Very High | 98.5 | ||
| 3 | NM | Very High | 93.8 | ||
| 4 | NM | Very High | 90.5 | ||
| 5 | NM | Very High | 87.8 | ||
| 6 | NM | Very High | 86.3 | ||
| 7 | NM | Very High | 84.4 | ||
| 8 | NM | Very High | 83.7 | ||
| 9 | NM | Very High | 82.3 | ||
| 10 | NM | Very High | 81.7 | ||
| 11 | NM | Very High | 80.5 | ||
| 12 | NM | Relatively High | 77.7 | ||
| 13 | NM | Relatively High | 75.4 | ||
| 14 | NM | Relatively High | 75.2 | ||
| 15 | NM | Relatively High | 74.1 | ||
| 16 | NM | Relatively High | 71.1 | ||
| 17 | NM | Relatively High | 70.7 | ||
| 18 | NM | Relatively High | 68.6 | ||
| 19 | NM | Relatively Moderate | 51.1 | ||
| 20 | NM | Relatively Low | 21.7 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
Community Resilience
Community Resilience measures a County's ability to prepare for anticipated natural hazards, adapt to changing conditions, and withstand and recover rapidly from disruptions.
Community Resilience Legend
| Rank | Community | State | Rating | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
| 1 | NM | Relatively Low | 36.7 | ||
|
156 lower-risk communities were omitted from this report. View the list â¡
|
|||||
About the National Risk Index
The National Risk Index is a dataset and online tool to help illustrate the United States communities most at risk for 18 natural hazards: Avalanche, Coastal Flooding, Cold Wave, Drought, Earthquake, Hail, Heat Wave, Hurricane, Ice Storm, Landslide, Lightning, Riverine Flooding, Strong Wind, Tornado, Tsunami, Volcanic Activity, Wildfire, and Winter Weather.
The National Risk Index leverages available source data for Expected Annual Loss due to these 18 hazard types, Social Vulnerability, and Community Resilience to develop a baseline relative risk measurement for each United States county and Census tract. These measurements are calculated using average past conditions, but they cannot be used to predict future outcomes for a community. The National Risk Index is intended to fill gaps in available data and analyses to better inform federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial decision makers as they develop risk reduction strategies.
Explore the National Risk Index Map at hazards.fema.gov/nri/map.
Visit the National Risk Index website at hazards.fema.gov/nri/learn-more to access supporting documentation and links.
Calculating the Risk Index
Risk Index scores are calculated using an equation that combines scores for Expected Annual Loss due to natural hazards, Social Vulnerability and Community Resilience:
Risk Index = Expected Annual Loss × ÷ Community Resilience
Risk Index scores are presented as a composite score for all 18 hazard types, as well as individual scores for each hazard type.
For more information, visit hazards.fema.gov/nri/determining-risk.
Calculating Expected Annual Loss
Expected Annual Loss scores are calculated using an equation that combines values for exposure, annualized frequency, and historic loss ratios for 18 hazard types:
Expected Annual Loss = Exposure × Annualized Frequency × Historic Loss Ratio
Expected Annual Loss scores are presented as a composite score for all 18 hazard types, as well as individual scores for each hazard type.
For more information, visit hazards.fema.gov/nri/expected-annual-loss.
Calculating Social Vulnerability
Social Vulnerability is measured using the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
For more information, visit hazards.fema.gov/nri/social-vulnerability.
Calculating Community Resilience
Community Resilience is measured at the County level using the Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities (HVRI BRIC) published by the University of South Carolina's Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute (HVRI).
For more information, visit hazards.fema.gov/nri/community-resilience.
How to Take Action
There are many ways to reduce natural hazard risk through mitigation. Communities with high National Risk Index scores can take action to reduce risk by decreasing Expected Annual Loss due to natural hazards, decreasing Social Vulnerability, and increasing Community Resilience.
For information about how to take action and reduce your risk, visit hazards.fema.gov/nri/take-action.
Disclaimer
The National Risk Index (the Risk Index or the Index) and its associated data are meant for planning purposes only. This tool was created for broad nationwide comparisons and is not a substitute for localized risk assessment analysis. Nationwide datasets used as inputs for the National Risk Index are, in many cases, not as accurate as available local data. Users with access to local data for each National Risk Index risk factor should consider substituting the Risk Index data with local data to recalculate a more accurate risk index. If you decide to download the National Risk Index data and substitute it with local data, you assume responsibility for the accuracy of the data and any resulting data index. Please visit the Contact Us page if you would like to discuss this process further.
The methodology used by the National Risk Index has been reviewed by subject matter experts in the fields of natural hazard risk research, risk analysis, mitigation planning, and emergency management. The processing methods used to create the National Risk Index have produced results similar to those from other natural hazard risk analyses conducted on a smaller scale. The breadth and combination of geographic information systems (GIS) and data processing techniques leveraged by the National Risk Index enable it to incorporate multiple hazard types and risk factors, manage its nationwide scope, and capture what might have been missed using other methods.
The National Risk Index does not consider the intricate economic and physical interdependencies that exist across geographic regions. Keep in mind that hazard impacts in surrounding counties or Census tracts can cause indirect losses in your community regardless of your community's risk profile.
Nationwide data available for some risk factors are rudimentary at this time. The National Risk Index will be continuously updated as new data become available and improved methodologies are identified.
The National Risk Index Contact Us page is available at hazards.fema.gov/nri/contact-us.